Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19575301›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2009

Cytogenetic anchoring of radiation hybrid and virtual maps of sheep chromosome X and comparison of X chromosomes in sheep, cattle, and human.

Tom Goldammer, Ronald M Brunner, Alexander Rebl, Chun Hua Wu, Ko Nomura, Tracy Hadfield, Jill F Maddox, Noelle E Cockett

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular Cytogenetics in Domestic Bovids: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. The Cytogenetics of the Water Buffalo: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Molecular cytogenetic insights to the phylogenetic affinities of the giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) and pronghorn (Antilocapra americana).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Advanced comparative cytogenetic analysis of X chromosomes in river buffalo, cattle, sheep, and human.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Tom GoldammerForschungsbereich Molekularbiologie, Forschungsinstitut für die Biologie landwirtschaftlicher Nutztiere, Dummerstorf, Germany. tomgoldammer@fbn-dummerstorf.de
Ronald M Brunner
Alexander Rebl
Chun Hua Wu
Ko Nomura
Tracy Hadfield
Jill F Maddox
Noelle E Cockett
Utah State University · USResearch Institute of Organic Agriculture · BELandesforschungsanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Fischerei Mecklenburg-Vorpommern · DEThe University of Melbourne · AUTokyo University of Agriculture · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comprehensive physical map was generated for Ovis aries chromosome X (OARX) based on a cytogenomics approach. DNA probes were prepared from bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones from the CHORI-243 sheep library and were assigned to G-banded metaphase spreads via fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). A total of 22 BACs gave a single hybridization signal to the X chromosome and were assigned out of 32 tested. The positioned BACs contained 16 genes and a microsatellite marker which represent new cytogenetically mapped loci in the sheep genome. The gene and microsatellite loci serve to anchor between the existing radiation hybrid (RH) and virtual sheep genome (VSG) maps to the cytogenetic OARX map, whilst the BACs themselves also serve as anchors between the VSG and the cytogenetic maps. An additional 17 links between the RH and cytogenetic maps are provided by BAC end sequence (BES) derived markers that have also been positioned on the RH map. Comparison of the map orders for the cytogenetic, RH, and virtual maps reveals that the orders for the cytogenetic and RH maps are most similar, with only one locus, represented by BAC CH243-330E18, mapping to relatively different positions. Several discrepancies, including an inverted segment are found when comparing both the cytogenetic and RH maps with the virtual map. These discrepancies highlight the value of using physical mapping methods to inform the process of future in silico map construction. A detailed comparative analysis of sheep, human, and cattle mapping data allowed the construction of a comparative map that confirms and expands the knowledge about evolutionary conservation and break points between the X chromosomes of the three mammalian species.

Indexed as

Physical Chromosome MappingAnimalsBase SequenceCattleChromosome BandingChromosome BreakageChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialChromosomes, Human, XColoring AgentsComputer SimulationDNA ProbesFluorescein-5-isothiocyanateFluorescent DyesGenetic MarkersGenomeHumansColoring AgentsDNA ProbesFluorescein-5-isothiocyanateFluorescent DyesGenetic MarkersPropidium

Identifiers

PMID19575301
OpenAlexW1989901354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.