Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19575296›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychology review2009

Memory-prediction errors and their consequences in schizophrenia.

Michael S Kraus, Richard S E Keefe, Ranga K R Krishnan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychology review, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prediction error, ketamine and psychosis: An updated model.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2016
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Failures in learning-dependent predictive perception as the key cognitive vulnerability to psychosis in schizophrenia.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2011
    Article
  7. Update on memory systems and processes.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2011
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael S KrausDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. michael.kraus@duke.edu
Richard S E Keefe
Ranga K R Krishnan
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive deficits play a central role in the onset of schizophrenia. Cognitive impairment precedes the onset of psychosis in at least a subgroup of patients, and accounts for considerable dysfunction. Yet cognitive deficits as currently measured are not significantly related to hallucinations and delusions. Part of this counterintuitive absence of a relationship may be caused by the lack of an organizing principle of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia research. We review literature suggesting that a system of memory-based prediction is central to human perception, thought and action , and forward the notion that many of the symptoms of schizophrenia are a result of a failure of this system.

Indexed as

MemorySchizophreniaSchizophrenic PsychologyAnimalsBrainCognitionCognition DisordersHumansMemory DisordersModels, TheoreticalPerception

Identifiers

PMID19575296
OpenAlexW2055308435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.