Should guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

1. From precision medicine to precision care: Choosing and using precision medicine in the context of multimorbidity.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2023
   Review
2. Prescription of vitamin D among Swiss pediatricians.European journal of pediatrics · 2019
   Article
3. Appraising the methodological quality of the clinical practice guideline for diabetes mellitus using the AGREE II instrument: a methodological evaluation.JRSM open · 2017
   Article
4. Which is the best current guideline for the diagnosis and management of cystic pancreatic neoplasms? An appraisal using evidence-based practice methods.European radiology · 2016
   Review
5. The use of research evidence on patient preferences in pharmaceutical coverage decisions and clinical practice guideline development: exploratory study into current state of play and potential barriers.BMC health services research · 2014
   Article
6. High methodologic quality but poor applicability: assessment of the AAOS guidelines using the AGREE II instrument.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2014
   Article
7. Integrating evidence on patient preferences in healthcare policy decisions: protocol of the patient-VIP study.Implementation science : IS · 2013
   Article
8. "They Should Be Asking Us": A Qualitative Decisional Needs Assessment for Women Considering Cervical Cancer Screening.Global qualitative nursing research
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  How well do guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences?2009

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as