Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19575231›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2009

Occurrence of Dirofilaria immitis and tick-borne infections caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Ehrlichia canis in domestic dogs in France: results of a countrywide serologic survey.

Nikola Pantchev, Roland Schaper, Sandy Limousin, Nina Norden, Miriam Weise, Leif Lorentzen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prevalence of Lyme Disease and Relapsing FeverPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Molecular detection of Spirochetes andOpen veterinary journal · 2023
    Article
  6. Evidence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Simultaneous Exposure toPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Epidemiological and Clinicopathological Features ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Review
  10. Seroprevalence ofMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Nikola PantchevVet Med Labor GmbH, Division of IDEXX Laboratories, Ludwigsburg, Germany. nikola-pantchev@idexx.com
Roland Schaper
Sandy Limousin
Nina Norden
Miriam Weise
Leif Lorentzen
IDEXX Laboratories (Germany) · DEBayer (France) · FRBayer (Germany) · DEIDEXX Laboratories (France) · FRIDEXX Laboratories (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The occurrence of Dirofilaria immitis antigen and antibodies against tick-borne pathogens in French dogs has been analysed based on 1,050 blood samples. Serum samples of 919 dogs (group A) were sent for a variety of diagnostic investigations, further 131 dogs (group B) were tested for a tentative diagnosis of heartworm disease. All samples were tested for D. immitis antigen. Samples in group A were also tested for specific antibodies against three tick-borne pathogens (Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Ehrlichia canis). Results were plotted in geographical maps. Occurrence of D. immitis antigen in group A (0.22%; 95 % CI: 0.03-0.78%) was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) than in group B (6.87%; 95% CI: 3.19-12.64%). Heartworm infections in both groups were regionally restricted to the areas of Bouches-du-Rhône in the South of France and Corsica. In group A, the calculated seroprevalence was 2.72% (95% CI: 1.77-3.99%) for A. phagocytophilum, 1.09% (95% CI: 0.52-1.99%) for B. burgdorferi and 0.33% (95% CI: 0.07-0.95%) for E. canis with a distribution of the positive cases throughout the country. This study represents the first data of A. phagocytophilum seroprevalence in the French dog population.

Indexed as

Anaplasma phagocytophilumAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, HelminthBorrelia burgdorferi GroupDirofilaria immitisDirofilariasisDog DiseasesDogsEhrlichia canisEhrlichiosisFranceGeographyLyme DiseaseSeroepidemiologic StudiesTick-Borne DiseasesAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, Helminth

Identifiers

PMID19575231
OpenAlexW2088026400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.