Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19575147›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2010

Information gaps for patients requiring craniotomy for benign brain lesion: a qualitative study.

Linda Rozmovits, Kathleen Joy Khu, Soha Osman, Fred Gentili, Abhijit Guha, Mark Bernstein

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Surgical Informed Consent: A Scoping Review of Physician-facing Decision Support Tools.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Legal challenges in neurological practice.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2016
    Review
  11. Review
  12. A nine-year review of medicolegal claims in neurosurgery.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2014
    Article
  13. Together and apart: providing psychosocial support for patients and families living with brain tumors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014
    Article
  14. Care and support needs of patients and carers early post-discharge following treatment for non-malignant brain tumour: establishing a new reality.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Article
  15. A qualitative assessment of the supportive care and resource needs of patients undergoing craniotomy for benign brain tumours.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linda RozmovitsDivision of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, 4 West Wing, Toronto, ON M5T2S8, Canada.
Kathleen Joy Khu
Soha Osman
Fred Gentili
Abhijit Guha
Mark Bernstein
Toronto Western Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP 77670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Doctor-patient communication in the setting of a life-threatening illness poses considerable challenges. This study aimed to determine the information needs of a subset of neurosurgical patients. Qualitative case study methodology was used. Twenty-five semi-structured interviews were conducted with ambulatory adult patients who had undergone surgery for a benign brain tumor, arteriovenous malformation, or unruptured aneurysm. Interviews were digitally audio recorded and transcribed, and the data subjected to thematic analysis. Six overarching themes emerged from the data: (1) the amount of information patients want varies; (2) the type of information needed is not limited to information about treatment options and risks; (3) patients engage in independent information seeking for a variety of reasons; (4) patients consider compassion from their surgeon as important; (5) direct communication with the surgeon post-operatively is very important; and (6) patients' information needs are greatest post-operatively. Many patients felt that the amount and quality of information they received was not sufficient, particularly regarding post-operative recovery and long-term life issues, leading many to do their own research. The findings from this study emphasize the need for improved communication with patients so they can participate meaningfully in choices about their treatment, give a truly informed consent, and effectively participate in their own recovery.

Indexed as

CommunicationInformed ConsentPhysician-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain InjuriesCraniotomyDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID19575147
PMCPMC2808535
OpenAlexW2153398476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.