Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19574308›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2009

Public perceptions, anxiety, and behaviour change in relation to the swine flu outbreak: cross sectional telephone survey.

G James Rubin, Richard Amlôt, Lisa Page, Simon Wessely

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 457 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
457citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
167.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

457 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. The Effect of Risk Communication on Public Behavior to Non-Conventional Terrorism-Randomized Control Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Compliance with Health Recommendations and Vaccine Hesitancy During the COVID Pandemic in Nine Countries.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

397 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

G James RubinKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Psychological Medicine, Weston Education Centre, London SE5 9RJ. g.rubin@iop.kcl.ac.uk
Richard Amlôt
Lisa Page
Simon Wessely
King's College London · GBHealth Protection Agency · MV

Funding

Department of Health CDF/01/024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess whether perceptions of the swine flu outbreak predicted changes in behaviour among members of the public in England, Scotland, and Wales.

designCross sectional telephone survey using random digit dialling.

settingInterviews by telephone between 8 and 12 May.

participants997 adults aged 18 or more who had heard of swine flu and spoke English.

main outcome measuresRecommended change in behaviour (increases in handwashing and surface cleaning or plans made with a "flu friend") and avoidance behaviours (engaged in one or more of six behaviours such as avoiding large crowds or public transport).

results37.8% of participants (n=377) reported performing any recommended behaviour change "over the past four days . . . because of swine flu." 4.9% (n=49) had carried out any avoidance behaviour. Controlling for personal details and anxiety, recommended changes were associated with perceptions that swine flu is severe, that the risk of catching it is high risk, that the outbreak will continue for a long time, that the authorities can be trusted, that good information has been provided, that people can control their risk of catching swine flu, and that specific behaviours are effective in reducing the risk. Being uncertain about the outbreak and believing that the outbreak had been exaggerated were associated with a lower likelihood of change. The strongest predictor of behaviour change was ethnicity, with participants from ethnic minority groups being more likely to make recommended changes (odds ratio 3.2, 95% confidence interval 2.0 to 5.3) and carry out avoidance behaviours (4.1, 2.0 to 8.4).

conclusionsThe results support efforts to inform the public about specific actions that can reduce the risks from swine flu and to communicate about the government's plans and resources. Tackling the perception that the outbreak has been "over-hyped" may be difficult but worthwhile. Additional research is required into differing reactions to the outbreak among ethnic groups.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthDisease OutbreaksInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeAdolescentAdultAgedAnxiety DisordersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfluenza, HumanMaleMiddle AgedPamphletsPatient Education as TopicTelephone

Identifiers

PMID19574308
PMCPMC2714687
OpenAlexW2077805027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.