ArticleClinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology2009
Toward a high-throughput auditory P300-based brain-computer interface.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-time two-dimensional asynchronous control of a computer cursor with a single subdural electrode.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2012Trial
- The ASME-speller: 30-class auditory brain-computer interface speller using stream segregation and the QWERTY layout.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Single-subject auditory ERP-BCI performance enhancement in ALS via an AI coding assistant prompt.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- A comparison of visual and auditory EEG interfaces for robot multi-stage task control.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2024Article
- Design of auditory P300-based brain-computer interfaces with a single auditory channel and no visual support.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2023Article
- Target of selective auditory attention can be robustly followed with MEG.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Brain-computer interface paradigms and neural coding.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Event-Related Potential-Based Brain-Computer Interface Using the Thai Vowels' and Numerals' Auditory Stimulus Pattern.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A P300 Brain-Computer Interface Paradigm Based on Electric and Vibration Simple Command Tactile Stimulation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Signal Generation, Acquisition, and Processing in Brain Machine Interfaces: A Unified Review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
- Towards the Recognition of the Emotions of People with Visual Disabilities through Brain-Computer Interfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- How Does the Degree of Valence Influence Affective Auditory P300-Based BCIs?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Guidelines for Feature Matching Assessment of Brain-Computer Interfaces for Augmentative and Alternative Communication.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2018Review
- Brain-Computer Interfaces for Augmentative and Alternative Communication: A Tutorial.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2018Review
- Usage of drip drops as stimuli in an auditory P300 BCI paradigm.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2018Article
- Comparison of Four Control Methods for a Five-Choice Assistive Technology.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2018Article
- Eyes-Closed Increases the Usability of Brain-Computer Interfaces Based on Auditory Event-Related Potentials.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2018Article
- Improving the Performance of an Auditory Brain-Computer Interface Using Virtual Sound Sources by Shortening Stimulus Onset Asynchrony.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Rehabilitation of People with Motor Impairment:Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2018Review
- EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveBrain-computer interface (BCI) technology can provide severely disabled people with non-muscular communication. For those most severely disabled, limitations in eye mobility or visual acuity may necessitate auditory BCI systems. The present study investigates the efficacy of the use of six environmental sounds to operate a 6x6 P300 Speller.
methodsA two-group design was used to ascertain whether participants benefited from visual cues early in training. Group A (N=5) received only auditory stimuli during all 11 sessions, whereas Group AV (N=5) received simultaneous auditory and visual stimuli in initial sessions after which the visual stimuli were systematically removed. Stepwise linear discriminant analysis determined the matrix item that elicited the largest P300 response and thereby identified the desired choice.
resultsOnline results and offline analyses showed that the two groups achieved equivalent accuracy. In the last session, eight of 10 participants achieved 50% or more, and four of these achieved 75% or more, online accuracy (2.8% accuracy expected by chance). Mean bit rates averaged about 2 bits/min, and maximum bit rates reached 5.6 bits/min.
conclusionsThis study indicates that an auditory P300 BCI is feasible, that reasonable classification accuracy and rate of communication are achievable, and that the paradigm should be further evaluated with a group of severely disabled participants who have limited visual mobility. SIGNIFICANCE: With further development, this auditory P300 BCI could be of substantial value to severely disabled people who cannot use a visual BCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.