Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19573170›Full record

ReviewAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2009

Review article: gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis--physiological foundations, technical aspects and clinical implications.

E Soffer, T Abell, Z Lin, A Lorincz, R McCallum, H Parkman, S Policker, T Ordog

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Neuromodulation for functional upper gastrointestinal diseases.Gut microbiota and integrative wellness · 2023
    Article
  7. Nausea and Vomiting in 2021: A Comprehensive Update.Journal of clinical gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Gastroparesis in the 2020s: New Treatments, New Paradigms.Current gastroenterology reports · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Diabetic Gastroparesis.Endocrine reviews · 2019
    Review
  12. Gastric Electric Stimulation for Refractory Gastroparesis.Journal of clinical outcomes management : JCOM · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Neurostimulation of the gastrointestinal tract: review of recent developments.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2015
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Gastric stimulation for weight loss.World journal of gastroenterology · 2012
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

E SofferCedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA. edy.soffer@cshs.org
T Abell
Z Lin
A Lorincz
R McCallum
H Parkman
S Policker
T Ordog
Mayo Clinic · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USMetacure (United States) · USTemple University · USUniversity of Mississippi · US

Funding

Interstitial Cells of Cajal in Diabetic GastropathyR01DK058185 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI ORDOG, TAMAS · 2002 to 2020
$5.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK58185NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK058185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApplication of electrical stimulation to the gut, primarily the stomach, has rapidly advanced in the last two decades, from mostly animal studies to the clinical arena. Most studies focused on the use of electrical stimulation for gastroparesis, the only approved indication for such intervention.

aimTo review the physiological basis of gastric electrical activity and the technical aspects and clinical outcome of gastric electrical stimulation (GES) for gastroparesis.

methodsPubMed search from 1966 to 2009, using gastroparesis and GES as search terms. Areas in focus were systematically reviewed.

resultsThe literature consists of open-label studies, mostly from single centres, published in the last decade. Improvement in symptoms, quality of life and nutritional status was reported by most studies. Physiologically, stimulation parameters approved in clinical practice do not regulate gastric slow wave activity and have inconsistent effect on gastric emptying. The mechanism of action of GES is not fully known, but data support modulation of gastric biomechanical activity and afferent neural mechanisms.

conclusionsGastric electrical stimulation is a helpful intervention in recalcitrant gastroparesis. Controlled studies and better understanding of mechanisms of action of electrical stimulation are needed to evaluate further the clinical utility of this intervention and to exploit its therapeutic potential better.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyEpidemiologic MethodsGastric EmptyingGastroparesisHumansTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID19573170
PMCPMC3049171
OpenAlexW2065832086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.