ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2009
Relationship between conformational changes in pol lambda's active site upon binding incorrect nucleotides and mismatch incorporation rates.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decision-making during NHEJ: a network of interactions in human Polμ implicated in substrate recognition and end-bridging.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- "Gate-keeper" residues and active-site rearrangements in DNA polymerase μ help discriminate non-cognate nucleotides.PLoS computational biology · 2013Article
- Biomolecularmodeling and simulation: a field coming of age.Quarterly reviews of biophysics · 2011Review
- Modeling DNA polymerase μ motions: subtle transitions before chemistry.Biophysical journal · 2010Article
- DNA pol λ's extraordinary ability to stabilize misaligned DNA.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The correct replication and repair of DNA is critical for a cell's survival. Here, we investigate the fidelity of mammalian DNA polymerase lambda (pol lambda) utilizing dynamics simulation of the enzyme bound to incorrect incoming nucleotides including A:C, A:G, A(syn):G, A:A, A(syn):A, and T:G, all of which exhibit differing incorporation rates for pol lambda as compared to A:T bound to pol lambda. The wide range of DNA motion and protein residue side-chain motions observed in the mismatched systems demonstrates distinct differences when compared to the reference (correct base pair) system. Notably, Arg517's interactions with the DNA template strand bases in the active site are more limited, and Arg517 displays increased interactions with the incorrect dNTPs. This effect suggests that Arg517 helps provide a base-checking mechanism to discriminate correct from incorrect dNTPs. In addition, we find Tyr505 and Phe506 also play key roles in this base checking. A survey of the electrostatic potential landscape of the active sites and concomitant changes in electrostatic interaction energy between Arg517 and the dNTPs reveals that pol lambda binds incorrect dNTPs less tightly than the correct dNTP. These trends lead us to propose the following order for mismatch insertion by pol lambda: A:C > A:G > A(syn):G > T:G > A(syn):A > A:A. This sequence agrees with available kinetic data for incorrect nucleotide insertion opposite template adenine, with the exception of T:G, which may be more sensitive to the insertion context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.