Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19571728›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer disease and associated disorders

Comparison of recruitment efforts targeted at primary care physicians versus the community at large for participation in Alzheimer disease clinical trials.

Sarah A Carr, Roberta Davis, Diane Spencer, Marie Smart, Joanna Hudson, Stephanie Freeman, Greg E Cooper, Fred A Schmitt, William R Markesbery, Deborah Danner and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer disease and associated disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Diversifying Recruitment Registries: Considering Neighborhood Health Metrics.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Recruiting Community-Based Dementia Patients and Caregivers in a Nonpharmacologic Randomized Trial: What Works and How Much Does It Cost?Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. A Multipronged, Adaptive Approach for the Recruitment of Diverse Community-Residing Elders with Memory Impairment: The MIND at Home Experience.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sarah A CarrDepartment of Neurology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY 40536, USA. gajich2@email.uky.edu
Roberta Davis
Diane Spencer
Marie Smart
Joanna Hudson
Stephanie Freeman
Greg E Cooper
Fred A Schmitt
William R Markesbery
Deborah Danner
Gregory A Jicha

Funding

University of Kentucky Alzheimer's Disease Core Center - Biomarker CoreP30AG028383 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI GOLD, BRIAN TIMOTHY, VAN ELDIK, LINDA J · 2006 to 2020
$23.3M
NIA NIH HHS 1 P30 AG028383NIA NIH HHS L30 AG032934NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inefficient and delayed recruitment into clinical trials in Alzheimer disease are major obstacles impeding progress in the discovery of more effective therapeutic strategies to combat this disease. Despite widespread recognition of this problem, limited empirical data demonstrating the effectiveness of specific recruitment strategies are available to guide recruitment endeavors. This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of recruitment efforts targeting either the primary care health professionals (PCPs) or patients and families with a community grass-roots outreach event. The primary outcome measure was actual study recruitment and participation in the 4 months postintervention. No research subjects were recruited from the PCP intervention, whereas 69 subjects were recruited into clinical studies from the community grass-roots outreach event activity (0% vs. 28%, P<0.0001, Fisher exact test). Barriers to recruitment success in the PCP arm included a perception of perceived harm to subjects from research participation and fear of losing patients through clinical research participation. Our results suggest that outreach efforts directed at the potential study subject/caregiver are not only cost-effective but are able to easily accomplish the desired result of direct recruitment into clinical research studies.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAgedAlzheimer DiseaseClinical Trials as TopicCommunity NetworksCost-Benefit AnalysisEducation, Medical, ContinuingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysicians, Family

Identifiers

PMID19571728
PMCPMC2877762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.