Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19571244›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2009

Lateral genetic transfer: open issues.

Mark A Ragan, Robert G Beiko

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A One Health Perspective onMicroorganisms · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dissecting the effects of antibiotics on horizontal gene transfer: Analysis suggests a critical role of selection dynamics.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Transfer of noncoding DNA drives regulatory rewiring in bacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Recovering the treelike trend of evolution despite extensive lateral genetic transfer: a probabilistic analysis.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2013
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Promoter propagation in prokaryotes.Nucleic acids research · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Mark A RaganInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. m.ragan@imb.uq.edu.au
Robert G Beiko
University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lateral genetic transfer (LGT) is an important adaptive force in evolution, contributing to metabolic, physiological and ecological innovation in most prokaryotes and some eukaryotes. Genomic sequences and other data have begun to illuminate the processes, mechanisms, quantitative extent and impact of LGT in diverse organisms, populations, taxa and environments; deep questions are being posed, and the provisional answers sometimes challenge existing paradigms. At the same time, there is an enhanced appreciation of the imperfections, biases and blind spots in the data and in analytical approaches. Here we identify and consider significant open questions concerning the role of LGT in genome evolution.

Indexed as

EnvironmentEvolution, MolecularModels, GeneticPhylogenyGene Transfer, HorizontalGenome

Identifiers

PMID19571244
PMCPMC2872999
OpenAlexW2124788609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.