Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19571202›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2009

Membrane capacitance measurements revisited: dependence of capacitance value on measurement method in nonisopotential neurons.

Jorge Golowasch, Gladis Thomas, Adam L Taylor, Arif Patel, Arlene Pineda, Christopher Khalil, Farzan Nadim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Origin of Dielectric Permittivity in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cell Membrane Capacitance (Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Classifying Storage Temperature for Mandarin (Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jorge GolowaschDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey 07102, USA. Jorge.P.Golowasch@njit.edu
Gladis Thomas
Adam L Taylor
Arif Patel
Arlene Pineda
Christopher Khalil
Farzan Nadim

Funding

Variability and Compensation in Reliable Neuronal NetworksR01MH046742 · NIMH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MARDER, EVE E · 1990 to 2025
$7.8M
REGULATION OF NEURONAL OSCILLATIONS BY SYNAPTIC DYNAMICSR01MH060605 · NIMH · NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Dirk Martin Bucher, Farzan Nadim · 2001 to 2026
$6.6M
Role of neuromodulators and activity in the regulation of ionic currents and neurR01MH064711 · NIMH · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI GOLOWASCH, JORGE P · 2002 to 2013
$2.3M
INTRINSIC PLASTICITY IN OSCILLATORY NEURAL NETWORKSR37MH046742 · NIMH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MARDER, EVE E · 1995 to 2004
$1.5M
Neuronal variability and invariantsF32NS050928 · NINDS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI TAYLOR, ADAM L · 2005 to 2006
$99k
NIMH NIH HHS MH-46742NIMH NIH HHS MH-60605NIMH NIH HHS MH-64711NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060605NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064711NINDS NIH HHS NS-50928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During growth or degeneration neuronal surface area can change dramatically. Measurements of membrane protein concentration, as in ion channel or ionic conductance density, are often normalized by membrane capacitance, which is proportional to the surface area, to express changes independently from cell surface variations. Several electrophysiological protocols are used to measure cell capacitance, all based on the assumption of membrane isopotentiality. Yet, most neurons violate this assumption because of their complex anatomical structure, raising the question of which protocol yields measurements that are closest to the actual total membrane capacitance. We measured the capacitance of identified neurons from crab stomatogastric ganglia using three different protocols: the current-clamp step, the voltage-clamp step, and the voltage-clamp ramp protocols. We observed that the current-clamp protocol produced significantly higher capacitance values than those of either voltage-clamp protocol. Computational models of various anatomical complexities suggest that the current-clamp protocol can yield accurate capacitance estimates. In contrast, the voltage-clamp protocol estimates rapidly deteriorate as isopotentiality is reduced. We provide a mathematical description of these results by analyzing a simple two-compartment model neuron to facilitate an intuitive understanding of these methods. Together, the experiments, modeling, and mathematical analysis indicate that accurate total membrane capacitance measurements cannot be obtained with voltage-clamp protocols in nonisopotential neurons. Furthermore, although current-clamp steps can theoretically yield accurate measurements, experimentalists should be aware of limitations imposed by step duration and numerical errors during fitting procedures to obtain the membrane time constant.

Indexed as

Electric CapacitanceAlgorithmsAnimalsAxonsBrachyuraCell MembraneComputer SimulationDendritesGanglia, InvertebrateMicroelectrodesModels, NeurologicalNeuronsPatch-Clamp Techniques

Identifiers

PMID19571202
PMCPMC2775376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.