Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19571112›Full record

ReviewJournal of cell science2009

How peroxisomes multiply.

Ewald H Hettema, Alison M Motley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cell science, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mitochondrial and peroxisomal fission in cortical neurogenesis.The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pex11a deficiency causes dyslipidaemia and obesity in mice.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Peroxisomal biogenesis in ischemic brain.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. The peroxisome: an update on mysteries.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2012
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ewald H HettemaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Firth Court, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK. e.hettema@sheffield.ac.uk
Alison M Motley

Funding

Wellcome Trust 084265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With every cell division, peroxisomes duplicate and are segregated between progeny cells. Here, we discuss the different modes of peroxisome multiplication and the machinery that is involved in each case. Peroxisomes have been considered by many to be peripheral to mainstream cell biology. However, this is changing in response to the recent finding that peroxisomes obtain membrane constituents from the endoplasmic reticulum, making them the latest branch of the endomembrane system to be identified. Furthermore, the observations that peroxisome and mitochondrial biogenesis can occur in a coordinated manner, and that these organelles share factors for their multiplication, demonstrate previously unanticipated aspects of cellular organisation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DivisionEndoplasmic ReticulumHumansIntracellular MembranesMembrane FusionMembrane ProteinsMitochondriaPeroxisomesProtein TransportMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19571112
PMCPMC2704874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.