ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2009
Identification of 20 common human enterovirus serotypes by use of a reverse transcription-PCR-based reverse line blot hybridization assay.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular characterization of Coxsackievirus A2 isolated from hand, foot and mouth disease in eastern China.Microbial genomics · 2025Article
- Enteroviruses in Water: Epidemiology, Detection and Inactivation.Environmental microbiology · 2025Review
- Genome Sequences of Coxsackievirus B5 Isolates from Two Children with Meningitis in Australia.Genome announcements · 2017Article
- Simultaneously typing nine serotypes of enteroviruses associated with hand, foot, and mouth disease by a GeXP analyzer-based multiplex reverse transcription-PCR assay.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2012Article
- Multiplex PCR and reverse line blot hybridization assay (mPCR/RLB).Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2011Article
- Molecular identification and analysis of nonserotypeable human enteroviruses.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The more than 100 human enterovirus (HEV) serotypes can also be classified into four species, HEV-A to -D, based on phylogenetic analysis of multiple gene regions. Current molecular typing methods depend largely on reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) amplification and nucleotide sequencing of the entire or 3' half of the VP1 gene. An RT-PCR-based reverse line blot (RLB) hybridization assay was developed as a rapid and efficient approach to characterize common HEVs. Twenty HEV serotypes accounted for 87.1% of all HEVs isolated at an Australian reference virology laboratory from 1979 to 2007. VP1 sequences of all known HEV prototype strains were aligned to design one sense primer and three antisense primers for RT-PCR. After sequencing of the complete VP1 genes of 37 previously serotyped examples of the commonest 20 serotypes and alignment of these VP1 sequences with GenBank sequences, four serotype-specific probes for each serotype were designed for RLB. The RT-PCR-RLB assay was then applied to 132 HEV isolates, made up of the previously sequenced 37 isolates and another 95 serotyped clinical isolates. The RT-PCR-RLB genotypes corresponded with the serotypes for 131/132 isolates; the one exception was confirmed by VP1 sequencing, and the genotype was confirmed by repeat conventional serotyping. Genotyping by RT-PCR-RLB complements traditional serotyping methods and VP1 sequencing and has the advantages of convenience, speed, and accuracy. RT-PCR-RLB allows detection of specific enteroviral serotypes or genotypes associated with HEV outbreaks and significant disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.