Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19570793›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2010

Fluorescence two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis for biomaterial applications.

Laura E McNamara, Matthew J Dalby, Mathis O Riehle, Richard Burchmore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nanotopographical control of stem cell differentiation.Journal of tissue engineering · 2010
    Article
  10. NanoBioInterface: a multidisciplinary challenge.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2010
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura E McNamaraCentre for Cell Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK. l.mcnamara.1@research.gla.ac.uk
Matthew J Dalby
Mathis O Riehle
Richard Burchmore

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D526329/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council JF20604Medical Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (DiGE) is rapidly becoming established as a powerful technique for the characterization of differences in protein expression levels between two or more conditions. In this review, we consider the application of DiGE-both minimal and saturation labelling-to biomaterials research, considering the challenges and rewards of this approach.

Indexed as

FluorescenceBiocompatible MaterialsElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalProteinsProteomicsStaining and LabelingBiocompatible MaterialsProteins

Identifiers

PMID19570793
PMCPMC2843984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.