SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2009
The benefits of statins in people without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2009. The graph read 1 number from its abstract, feeding 1 cell of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. It is linked to trial NCT03007524 (A Randomized Comparison of Low-dose Versus High-dose Rosuvastatin on Optical Coherence Tomography Based Early Vascular Healing for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 273 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against
Treatment with statins significantly reduced the risk of all cause mortality (odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.81 to 0.96), major coronary events (0.70, 0.61 to 0.81), and major cerebrovascular events (0.81, 0.71 to 0.93).
clause the extractor read what became the number
Where it lands on the map
Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.
What it adds to each cell
For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.
Statins×all-cause mortality
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →13 readable studies in this cell: 3 favour the treatment, 8 find no difference, 2 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Comparison of Low-dose Versus High-dose Rosuvastatin on Optical Coherence Tomography Based Early Vascular Healing for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
Who cites it
273 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Preoperative statin therapy for adults undergoing cardiac surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Management in Korea: Full Version Recommendation of the Korean Diabetes Association.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2024Guideline
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Statin Therapy on Heart Transplantation.Reviews on recent clinical trials · 2024Pooled it
- 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Mellitus of the Korean Diabetes Association.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2023Guideline
- Serum Cholesterol Levels and Risk of Cardiovascular Death: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Pravastatin and placental insufficiency associated disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness of Ezetimibe plus statin lipid-lowering therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-utility studies.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- 2021 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Mellitus of the Korean Diabetes Association.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2021 · on this mapGuideline
- Statins in Healthy Adults: A Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Pooled it
- Clinical Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2020Guideline
- 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Korea.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2019Guideline
- Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2017.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2018Guideline
- Statin Use and the Risk of Cataracts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017Pooled it
- Statins for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Elderly Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Drugs & aging · 2015 · on this mapPooled it
- Statins Provide Less Benefit in Populations with High Noncardiovascular Mortality Risk: Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2015 · on this mapPooled it
- 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.Circulation · 2014 · on this mapGuideline
- Potential increased risk of cancer from commonly used medications: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2014Pooled it
- Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013 · on this mapPooled it
- Baseline Characteristics of Participants in STAREE: A Randomized Trial for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Events and Prolongation of Disability-Free Survival in Older People.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Trial
- Impact of coronary CT angiography in selection of treatment modalities and subsequent cardiovascular events in Thai patients with stable CAD.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Trial
213 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.
objectivesTo investigate whether statins reduce all cause mortality and major coronary and cerebrovascular events in people without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors, and whether these effects are similar in men and women, in young and older (>65 years) people, and in people with diabetes mellitus.
designMeta-analysis of randomised trials. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane controlled trials register, Embase, and Medline. Data abstraction Two independent investigators identified studies on the clinical effects of statins compared with a placebo or control group and with follow-up of at least one year, at least 80% or more participants without established cardiovascular disease, and outcome data on mortality and major cardiovascular disease events. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q and I(2) statistics. Publication bias was assessed by visual examination of funnel plots and the Egger regression test.
results10 trials enrolled a total of 70 388 people, of whom 23 681 (34%) were women and 16 078 (23%) had diabetes mellitus. Mean follow-up was 4.1 years. Treatment with statins significantly reduced the risk of all cause mortality (odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.81 to 0.96), major coronary events (0.70, 0.61 to 0.81), and major cerebrovascular events (0.81, 0.71 to 0.93). No evidence of an increased risk of cancer was observed. There was no significant heterogeneity of the treatment effect in clinical subgroups.
conclusionIn patients without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors, statin use was associated with significantly improved survival and large reductions in the risk of major cardiovascular events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.