Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19566998›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2009

People with learning disabilities who have cancer: an ethnographic study.

Irene Tuffrey-Wijne, Jane Bernal, Jane Hubert, Gary Butler, Sheila Hollins

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Patient perception of disease burden in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.Journal of scleroderma and related disorders · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Co-researching with people with learning disabilities: an experience of involvement in qualitative data analysis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Irene Tuffrey-WijneSt George's, Division of Mental Health, University of London, London. ituffrey@sgul.ac.uk
Jane Bernal
Jane Hubert
Gary Butler
Sheila Hollins

Funding

Cancer Research UK C19514/A6157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer incidence among people with learning disabilities is rising. There have been no published studies of the needs and experiences of people with learning disabilities and cancer, from their own perspective.

aimTo provide insight into the experiences and needs of people with learning disabilities who have cancer. DESIGN OF STUDY: Prospective qualitative study, using ethnographic methods.

settingParticipants' homes, hospitals, nursing homes, and hospices in London and surrounding areas.

methodThe participants were 13 people with learning disabilities ranging from mild to severe, who had a cancer diagnosis. The main method of data collection was participant observation (over 250 hours). The median length of participation was 7 months.

resultsParticipants' cancer experiences were shaped by their previous experience of life, which included deprivation, loneliness, and a lack of autonomy and power. They depended on others to negotiate contact with the outside world, including the healthcare system. This could lead to delayed cancer diagnosis and a lack of treatment options being offered. Most participants were not helped to understand their illness and its implications. Doctors did not make an assessment of capacity, but relied on carers' opinions.

conclusionUrgent action is warranted by findings of late diagnosis, possible discrimination around treatment options, and lack of patient involvement and assessment of capacity in decision making. There are significant gaps in knowledge and training among most health professionals, leading to disengaged services that are unaware of the physical, emotional, and practical needs of people with learning disabilities, and their carers.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthAdultCaregiversFamily PracticeFemaleHumansLearning DisabilitiesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProspective StudiesQualitative ResearchQuality of Health CareQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID19566998
PMCPMC2702015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.