Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19566654›Full record

ArticleXenotransplantation

Quantitative tools for assessing the fate of xenotransplanted human stem/progenitor cells in chimeric mice.

Kang Cheng, Sanjeev Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Xenotransplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kang ChengDepartment of Medicine, Marion Bessin Liver Research Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, 10461 NY, USA.
Sanjeev Gupta

Funding

WORD PROCESSORP30CA013330 · NCI · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI THOMAS E ROHAN · 1985 to 2026
$111.2M
Special Animal CoreP30DK041296 · NIDDK · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI WOLKOFF, ALLAN W · 1989 to 2018
$22.9M
Transplantation of Endothelial CellsR01DK071111 · NIDDK · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI GUPTA, SANJEEV · 2006 to 2016
$3.6M
LIVER REPOPULATION FOR LIVER INJURY AND GENE THERAPYR01DK046952 · NIDDK · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI GUPTA, SANJEEV · 1994 to 2007
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013330NCI NIH HHS P30 CA13330NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK041296NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK41296NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK046952NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK071111NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK46952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification of transplanted human cells in mouse models is important for studying the biology and therapeutic potential of stem/progenitor cells. As stem/progenitor cells are often transplanted in low numbers, detection of cell engraftment requires sensitive tools. Probes for single copy genes, as well as repetitive genetic elements are available for detecting transplanted cells, although their value relative to one another had not been defined.

methodsWe examined whether human sequences in chimeric mice could be measured with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reactions for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, type 1 repeat element, sex-determining region Y, or short tandem repeats (STR) across human leukocyte antigen (HLA) regions, which are distinct from rodent genomes.

resultsWe found that specific probes for all three candidate approaches successfully identified human cells in mixtures containing human and mouse genomes. However, probes for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease element or STRs for HLA regions were less effective for low numbers of transplanted human stem/progenitor cells in mice than human sex-determining region on Y-chromosome. None of the approaches could identify transplanted human cells constituting less than one percent of the total cell mass. This required localization of transplanted cells in tissue sections with human-specific in situ hybridization probes.

conclusionsQuantitative assays with probes for single copy gene sequences, STRs or sex-determining region will be helpful for demonstrating organ repopulation, although initial lower frequency engraftment of human cells in chimeric mice will be most effectively identified by complementary tools, such as in situ localization of human cells in tissues.

Indexed as

Graft SurvivalStem Cell TransplantationTransplantation ChimeraTransplantation, HeterologousAnimalsCharcot-Marie-Tooth DiseaseDNA ProbesFemaleGestational AgeHLA-A AntigensHumansLiverMaleMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDDNA ProbesHLA-A AntigensSex-Determining Region Y Protein

Identifiers

PMID19566654
PMCPMC2787247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.