Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19565342›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2009

Timing of births and endometrial cancer risk in Swedish women.

Ruth M Pfeiffer, Aya Mitani, Ola Landgren, Anders Ekbom, Sigurdur Y Kristinsson, Magnus Björkholm, Robert J Biggar, Louise A Brinton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Risk factors for endometrial cancer in Black women.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Pregnancy history and risk of endometrial cancer.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2011
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Ruth M PfeifferDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6120 Executive Blvd. EPS/RM 8030, Bethesda, MD 20892-7244, USA. pfeiffer@mail.nih.gov
Aya Mitani
Ola Landgren
Anders Ekbom
Sigurdur Y Kristinsson
Magnus Björkholm
Robert J Biggar
Louise A Brinton
Karolinska University Hospital · SEBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDepartment of Health and Human Services · USNational Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USStatens Serum Institut · DK

Funding

Epidemiologic Field StudiesZIACP010182 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI GAIL, MITCHELL H · 2009 to 2025
$11.9M
Descriptive Studies and Record LinkageZIACP010183 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI SHIELS, MEREDITH · 2009 to 2025
$10.7M
Epidemiologic Field StudiesZ01CP010182 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI GAIL, MITCHELL H · 2003 to 2008
$4.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CP010182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While a protective long-term effect of parity on endometrial cancer risk is well established, the impact of timing of births is not fully understood. We examined the relationship between endometrial cancer risk and reproductive characteristics in a population-based cohort of 2,674,465 Swedish women, 20-72 years of age. During follow-up from 1973 to 2004, 7,386 endometrial cancers were observed. Compared to uniparous women, nulliparous women had a significantly elevated endometrial cancer risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-1.42). Endometrial cancer risk decreased with increasing parity; compared to uniparous women, women with > or =4 births had a HR = 0.66 (95% CI, 0.59-0.74); p-trend < 0.001. Among multiparous women, we observed no relationship of risk with age at first birth after adjustment for other reproductive factors. While we initially observed a decreased risk with later ages at last birth, this appeared to reflect a stronger relationship with time since last birth, with women with shorter times being at lowest risk. In models for multiparous women that included number of births, age at first and last birth, and time since last birth, age at last birth was not associated with endometrial cancer risk, while shorter time since last birth and increased parity were associated with statistically significantly reduced endometrial cancer risks. The HR was 3.95 (95% CI; 2.17-7.20; p-trend = <0.0001) for women with > or =25 years since a last birth compared to women having given birth within 4 years. Our findings support that clearance of initiated cells during delivery may be important in endometrial carcinogenesis.

Indexed as

Birth IntervalsAdultAgedBirth OrderCarcinoma, EndometrioidEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaternal AgeMiddle AgedParityPregnancyRegistriesRisk FactorsSwedenTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID19565342
PMCPMC2843814
OpenAlexW1491235254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.