Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19565201›Full record

ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2009

[Epidermolysis bullosa. An update].

H Schumann

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

H SchumannUniversitäts-Hautklinik, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Hauptstr. 7, 79104 Freiburg. hauke.schumann@uniklinik-freiburg.de
Hautklinik Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) represents a group of diseases characterized by skin fragility usually developing blisters after minimal trauma. The clinical picture ranges from mild subtypes with minor skin reactions to severe forms with lethal outcome within the first months of life. In the severe generalized subtypes, complications such as aggressive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, anemia, esophageal stenosis and cardiomyopathy can occur so that multidisciplinary patient care is necessary. EB can be divided in four types--EB simplex (EBS), junctional EB (JEB), dystrophic EB (DEB) and Kindler syndrome. All together 33 subtypes can be distinguished. In 2008 a revised EB classification was introduced. Several eponyms for EB subtypes were replaced by descriptive names. The review presents the EB subtypes based on the new EB classification system, the molecular background and new therapeutic options.

Indexed as

DermatologyEpidermolysis BullosaGermanyHumans

Identifiers

PMID19565201
OpenAlexW2432574433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.