Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19564995›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2009

Pharmacists' and pharmacy students' ability to identify drug-related problems using TIMER (Tool to Improve Medications in the Elderly via Review).

Sarah Snyder Lee, Ann K Schwemm, Jeffrey Reist, Matthew Cantrell, Michael Andreski, William R Doucette, Elizabeth A Chrischilles, Karen B Farris

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Strategy to Improve Efficiency of Comprehensive Medication Reviews in a Community Pharmacy.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2019
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Polypharmacy-an Upward Trend with Unpredictable Effects.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah Snyder LeeKansas University Medical Center, KS, USA.
Ann K Schwemm
Jeffrey Reist
Matthew Cantrell
Michael Andreski
William R Doucette
Elizabeth A Chrischilles
Karen B Farris
University Hospital and Clinics · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

University of Iowa Older Adults CERTU18HS016094 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI CHRISCHILLES, ELIZABETH A · 2006 to 2010
$4.0M
AHRQ HHS 1 U18 HS 016094-01AHRQ HHS U18 HS016094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDetermine the effectiveness of TIMER (Tool to Improve Medications in the Elderly via Review) in helping pharmacists and pharmacy students identify drug-related problems during patient medication reviews.

methodsIn a randomized, controlled study design, geriatric patient cases were sent to 136 pharmacists and 108 third-year pharmacy students who were asked to identify drug related-problems (DRPs) with and without using TIMER.

resultsPharmacists identified more tool-related DRPs using TIMER (p = 0.027). Pharmacy students identified more tool-related DRPs using TIMER in the first case (p = 0.02), but not in the second.

conclusionTIMER increased the number of DRPs identified by practicing pharmacists and pharmacy students during medication reviews of hypothetical patient cases.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmacistsStudents, PharmacyAdultAgedDrug TherapyFemaleHumansMalePharmaciesYoung Adultcommunity pharmacydrug-related problemselderlymedication therapy management

Identifiers

PMID19564995
PMCPMC2703287
OpenAlexW2032682683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.