Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19564636›Full record

Trial reportBlood2009

Treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome patients with erythropoietin with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: results of a prospective randomized phase 3 trial by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E1996).

Peter L Greenberg, Zhuoxin Sun, Kenneth B Miller, John M Bennett, Martin S Tallman, Gordon Dewald, Elisabeth Paietta, Richard van der Jagt, Jessie Houston, Mary L Thomas and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00003138 (Phase III Evaluation of EPO With or Without G-CSF Versus Supportive Therapy Alone in the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes), which is not on this map. Cited by 76 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00003138 phase3completednot on this map

Phase III Evaluation of EPO With or Without G-CSF Versus Supportive Therapy Alone in the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes

TypeinterventionalSponsorEastern Cooperative Oncology GroupRan1998 to 2014Enrolled118ConditionsAnemia, Myelodysplastic SyndromesArmsErythropoietin, Filgrastim, Transfusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 204 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Myelodysplastic syndromes: clinical practice guidelines in oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2013
    Guideline
  8. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: myelodysplastic syndromes.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2011
    Guideline
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter L GreenbergStanford University Cancer Center, CA 94305, USA. peterg@stanford.edu
Zhuoxin Sun
Kenneth B Miller
John M Bennett
Martin S Tallman
Gordon Dewald
Elisabeth Paietta
Richard van der Jagt
Jessie Houston
Mary L Thomas
David Cella
Jacob M Rowe
Northwestern University · USCarle Foundation Hospital · USHarvard University · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMontefiore Medical Center · USOttawa Hospital · CAStanford University · USTufts Medical Center · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

ECOG OPERATIONS OFFICE (IBCSG)U10CA021115 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI COMIS, ROBERT L · 1985 to 2013
$132.6M
ECOG Statistical Office Data Management GrantU10CA066636 · NCI · FRONTIER SCI &TECHNOLOGY RSCH FDN, INC · PI GRAY, ROBERT J · 1994 to 2013
$39.5M
PROVIDE STATISTICAL SERVICESU10CA023318 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI GRAY, ROBERT J · 1985 to 2013
$33.4M
ECOG Specimen BankingU24CA114737 · NCI · FRONTIER SCI &TECHNOLOGY RSCH FDN, INC · PI COMIS, ROBERT L · 2005 to 2014
$9.3M
ECOG Clinical TrialsU10CA017145 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BENSON, AL B · 1985 to 2013
$6.1M
SOUTHWEST ONCOLOGY GROUPU10CA011083 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI FRIEDBERG, JONATHAN W · 1985 to 2013
$5.5M
ONCOLOGYU10CA013650 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI HABERMANN, THOMAS MATTHEW · 1985 to 2013
$3.1M
ONCOLOGYU10CA007190 · NCI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI ERBAN, JOHN K · 1985 to 2006
$2.4M
EASTERN COOPERATIVE ONCOLOGY GROUPU10CA080775 · NCI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BUBLEY, GLENN J · 1999 to 2013
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA07190NCI NIH HHS CA11083NCI NIH HHS CA13650NCI NIH HHS CA17145NCI NIH HHS CA21115NCI NIH HHS CA23318NCI NIH HHS CA66636NCI NIH HHS CA80775NCI NIH HHS U10 CA007190NCI NIH HHS U10 CA011083NCI NIH HHS U10 CA013650NCI NIH HHS U10 CA017145NCI NIH HHS U10 CA021115NCI NIH HHS U10 CA023318NCI NIH HHS U10 CA066636NCI NIH HHS U10 CA080775NCI NIH HHS U24 CA114737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This phase 3 prospective randomized trial evaluated the efficacy and long-term safety of erythropoietin (EPO) with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor plus supportive care (SC; n = 53) versus SC alone (n = 57) for the treatment of anemic patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. The response rates in the EPO versus SC alone arms were 36% versus 9.6%, respectively, at the initial treatment step, 47% in the EPO arm, including subsequent steps. Responding patients had significantly lower serum EPO levels (45% vs 5% responses for levels < 200 mU/mL vs > or = 200 mU/mL) and improvement in multiple quality-of-life domains. With prolonged follow-up (median, 5.8 years), no differences were found in overall survival of patients in the EPO versus SC arms (median, 3.1 vs 2.6 years) or in the incidence of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (7.5% and 10.5% patients, respectively). Increased survival was demonstrated for erythroid responders versus nonresponders (median, 5.5 vs 2.3 years). Flow cytometric analysis showed that the percentage of P-glycoprotein(+) CD34(+) marrow blasts was positively correlated with longer overall survival. In comparison with SC alone, patients receiving EPO with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor plus SC had improved erythroid responses, similar survival, and incidence of acute myeloid leukemia transformation.

Indexed as

AgedDrug Therapy, CombinationErythropoietinFemaleFlow CytometryGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMyelodysplastic SyndromesPrognosisProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRecombinant ProteinsRisk FactorsSurvival RateErythropoietinGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19564636
PMCPMC2746469
OpenAlexW2030437009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.