ArticleGenome research2009
mGene: accurate SVM-based gene finding with an application to nematode genomes.
Article in Genome research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- An overview of computational methods for gene prediction in eukaryotes: strengths, limitations, and future directions.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Review
- Review
- FINDER: an automated software package to annotate eukaryotic genes from RNA-Seq data and associated protein sequences.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Review on the Computational Genome Annotation of Sequences Obtained by Next-Generation Sequencing.Biology · 2020Review
- Machine learning: A powerful tool for gene function prediction in plants.Applications in plant sciences · 2020Review
- A Practical Approach to Artificial Intelligence in Plastic Surgery.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2020Article
- TaF: a web platform for taxonomic profile-based fungal gene prediction.Genes & genomics · 2019Article
- Closing target trimming and CTTdocker programs for discovering hidden superfamily loci in genomes.PloS one · 2019Article
- Seqping: gene prediction pipeline for plant genomes using self-training gene models and transcriptomic data.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Improved Prediction of Non-methylated Islands in Vertebrates Highlights Different Characteristic Sequence Patterns.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Challenges, Solutions, and Quality Metrics of Personal Genome Assembly in Advancing Precision Medicine.Pharmaceutics · 2016Review
- Revealing Missing Human Protein Isoforms Based on Ab Initio Prediction, RNA-seq and Proteomics.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- SnowyOwl: accurate prediction of fungal genes by using RNA-Seq and homology information to select among ab initio models.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Modeling DNA affinity landscape through two-round support vector regression with weighted degree kernels.BMC systems biology · 2014Article
- LABEL: fast and accurate lineage assignment with assessment of H5N1 and H9N2 influenza A hemagglutinins.PloS one · 2014Article
- Effective automated feature construction and selection for classification of biological sequences.PloS one · 2014Article
- Assessment of transcript reconstruction methods for RNA-seq.Nature methods · 2013Article
- Genomics: the state of the art in RNA-seq analysis.Nature methods · 2013Article
- MITIE: Simultaneous RNA-Seq-based transcript identification and quantification in multiple samples.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2013Article
- WebScipio: Reconstructing alternative splice variants of eukaryotic proteins.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a highly accurate gene-prediction system for eukaryotic genomes, called mGene. It combines in an unprecedented manner the flexibility of generalized hidden Markov models (gHMMs) with the predictive power of modern machine learning methods, such as Support Vector Machines (SVMs). Its excellent performance was proved in an objective competition based on the genome of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Considering the average of sensitivity and specificity, the developmental version of mGene exhibited the best prediction performance on nucleotide, exon, and transcript level for ab initio and multiple-genome gene-prediction tasks. The fully developed version shows superior performance in 10 out of 12 evaluation criteria compared with the other participating gene finders, including Fgenesh++ and Augustus. An in-depth analysis of mGene's genome-wide predictions revealed that approximately 2200 predicted genes were not contained in the current genome annotation. Testing a subset of 57 of these genes by RT-PCR and sequencing, we confirmed expression for 24 (42%) of them. mGene missed 300 annotated genes, out of which 205 were unconfirmed. RT-PCR testing of 24 of these genes resulted in a success rate of merely 8%. These findings suggest that even the gene catalog of a well-studied organism such as C. elegans can be substantially improved by mGene's predictions. We also provide gene predictions for the four nematodes C. briggsae, C. brenneri, C. japonica, and C. remanei. Comparing the resulting proteomes among these organisms and to the known protein universe, we identified many species-specific gene inventions. In a quality assessment of several available annotations for these genomes, we find that mGene's predictions are most accurate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.