Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19564452›Full record

ArticleGenome research2009

mGene: accurate SVM-based gene finding with an application to nematode genomes.

Gabriele Schweikert, Alexander Zien, Georg Zeller, Jonas Behr, Christoph Dieterich, Cheng Soon Ong, Petra Philips, Fabio De Bona, Lisa Hartmann, Anja Bohlen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. A Practical Approach to Artificial Intelligence in Plastic Surgery.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Gabriele SchweikertFriedrich Miescher Laboratory, Max Planck Society, Tübingen 72076, Germany.
Alexander Zien
Georg Zeller
Jonas Behr
Christoph Dieterich
Cheng Soon Ong
Petra Philips
Fabio De Bona
Lisa Hartmann
Anja Bohlen
Nina Krüger
Sören Sonnenburg
Gunnar Rätsch

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a highly accurate gene-prediction system for eukaryotic genomes, called mGene. It combines in an unprecedented manner the flexibility of generalized hidden Markov models (gHMMs) with the predictive power of modern machine learning methods, such as Support Vector Machines (SVMs). Its excellent performance was proved in an objective competition based on the genome of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Considering the average of sensitivity and specificity, the developmental version of mGene exhibited the best prediction performance on nucleotide, exon, and transcript level for ab initio and multiple-genome gene-prediction tasks. The fully developed version shows superior performance in 10 out of 12 evaluation criteria compared with the other participating gene finders, including Fgenesh++ and Augustus. An in-depth analysis of mGene's genome-wide predictions revealed that approximately 2200 predicted genes were not contained in the current genome annotation. Testing a subset of 57 of these genes by RT-PCR and sequencing, we confirmed expression for 24 (42%) of them. mGene missed 300 annotated genes, out of which 205 were unconfirmed. RT-PCR testing of 24 of these genes resulted in a success rate of merely 8%. These findings suggest that even the gene catalog of a well-studied organism such as C. elegans can be substantially improved by mGene's predictions. We also provide gene predictions for the four nematodes C. briggsae, C. brenneri, C. japonica, and C. remanei. Comparing the resulting proteomes among these organisms and to the known protein universe, we identified many species-specific gene inventions. In a quality assessment of several available annotations for these genomes, we find that mGene's predictions are most accurate.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceCaenorhabditisCaenorhabditis elegansComputational BiologyGenes, HelminthGenome, HelminthGenomicsReproducibility of ResultsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA Splice SitesSequence Analysis, DNATranscription Initiation SiteRNA Splice Sites

Identifiers

PMID19564452
PMCPMC2775605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.