ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2009
Activities of daptomycin and vancomycin alone and in combination with rifampin and gentamicin against biofilm-forming methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in an experimental model of endocarditis.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.
- Daptomycin plus fosfomycin versus daptomycin monotherapy in treating MRSA: protocol of a multicentre, randomised, phase III trial.BMJ open · 2015Trial
- Combinatorial phenotypic signatures distinguish persistent from resolving methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia isolates.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2011Trial
- The Computational Revolution in Natural Product Research: A Data-Driven Roadmap for Next-Generation Drug Development.Biology · 2026Review
- Reviving Old Antibiotics: New Indications and Therapeutic Perspectives-A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Lipopeptide Engineering: From Natural Origins to Rational Design Against Antimicrobial Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Enzymes-enhanced antibiotic therapy reduces biofilms to undetectable levels in an implant-associated infection model.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Article
- Biofilm structure as a key factor in antibiotic tolerance: insights from Bacillus subtilis model systems.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Article
- β-Lapachone encapsulated into stealth liposomes: inhibition of biofilm and cell wall thickness of MRSA.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025Article
- Global Trends in Orthopedic Biofilm Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of 1994-2022.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- What's the defect? Using mass defects to study oligomerization of membrane proteins and peptides in nanodiscs with native mass spectrometry.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2023Review
- Eradication of Staphylococcus epidermidis within Biofilms: Comparison of Systemic versus Supratherapeutic Concentrations of Antibiotics.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023Article
- A Highly Efficacious Electrical Biofilm Treatment System for Combating Chronic Wound Bacterial Infections.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2023Article
- Warfarin and Thrombotic Mechanical Aortic Valve - Be Cautious to Avoid Severe Warfarin Drug Interactions in Patients with Suspected Infective Endocarditis after Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement [Letter].Vascular health and risk management · 2023Article
- MPC-Based Prediction of Anti-Mutant Effectiveness of Antibiotic Combinations: In Vitro Model Study with Daptomycin and Gentamicin againstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- In Vitro Anti-Biofilm Activity of Bacteriophage K (ATCC 19685-B1) and Daptomycin against Staphylococci.Microorganisms · 2021Article
- Open wounds and rifampicin therapy are associated with rifampicin resistance among staphylococcal vascular graft/endograft infections.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2021Article
- Article
- Impact of rifampicin dose in bone and joint prosthetic device infections due to Staphylococcus spp: a retrospective single-center study in France.BMC infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Novel approaches for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Using nanoparticles to overcome multidrug resistance.Drug discovery today · 2021Review
- Evaluation of current dosing guidance for oral rifampicin treatment in adult patients with osteoarticular infections.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The findings of clinical and in vitro research support the theory that infective endocarditis (IE)-causing bacteria form biofilms and that biofilms negatively affect treatment outcomes. The purpose of the present study was to quantify the biofilm formation of methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates obtained from patients with IE and to evaluate the in vitro activities of daptomycin and vancomycin alone and in combination with rifampin (rifampicin) or gentamicin while monitoring the isolates for the development of resistance. A high-inoculum, stationary-phase infection model of IE was used to simulate the pharmacokinetics in humans of daptomycin at 6 mg/kg of body weight/day, vancomycin at 1.25 g every 12 h (q12h) alone and in combination with rifampin at 300 mg every 8 h, and gentamicin at 1.3 mg/kg q12h. Two randomly selected clinical MRSA isolates were obtained from patients with IE; both MRSA isolates quantitatively produced biofilms. The time to bactericidal activity in the presence of daptomycin was isolate dependent but was achieved by 24 h for both MRSA isolates. Vancomycin did not achieve bactericidal activity throughout the experiment. At 24, 48, and 72 h, daptomycin-containing regimens had significantly more activity (greater declines in the mean number of CFU/g) than any of the vancomycin-containing regimens (P = 0.03). Rifampin and gentamicin antagonized or delayed the bactericidal activity of daptomycin (against MRSA B346846 for rifampin and against both isolates for gentamicin) in the first 24 h. Increases in the daptomycin and vancomycin MICs were not observed. We conclude that in an IE model of biofilm-forming MRSA, daptomycin monotherapy has better in vitro activity than daptomycin in combination with rifampin or gentamicin or any vancomycin-containing regimen studied within the first 24 h. Further investigations are needed to understand the initial delay in bactericidal activity observed when gentamicin or rifampin is combined with daptomycin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.