Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19563296›Full record

ArticleJournal of periodontology2009

Within-subject variability in repeated measures of salivary analytes in healthy adults.

Mark V Thomas, Adam Branscum, Craig S Miller, Jeffrey Ebersole, Mohanad Al-Sabbagh, Julie L Schuster

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of periodontology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark V ThomasDivision of Periodontology, Department of Oral Health Practice, University of Kentucky College of Dentistry, Lexington, KY, USA. mvthom0@uky.edu
Adam Branscum
Craig S Miller
Jeffrey Ebersole
Mohanad Al-Sabbagh
Julie L Schuster

Funding

UKY DENTAL COBRE: POLYBACTERIAL PERIODONTITIS: N-3 PUFA AND ANTIOXIDANTSP20RR020145 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI EBERSOLE, JEFFREY L · 2004 to 2011
$18.3M
Effects of Oral Inflammation on the Levels of Salivary Biomarkers of AMIU01DE017793 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MCDEVITT, JOHN T · 2006 to 2012
$13.0M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR020145NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE017793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSaliva contains a large number of biomolecules, some of which have putative diagnostic usefulness. A potential problem with the use of biomolecules in diagnosis is day-to-day fluctuation due to within-subject variability. This study evaluated the intraindividual variability of six salivary analytes in healthy adults and determined their normal range.

methodsUnstimulated whole saliva (5 ml) was collected every 2 to 3 days on six occasions from 30 subjects in good oral and systemic health. Four of the samples were collected in the clinic, and two were collected by the subject at home. The concentration ranges of interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6, matrix metalloproteinase-8, prostaglandin E(2), tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interferon-alpha, and albumin were examined. Descriptive statistics were computed, and a one-way random-effects model was used to quantify within- and between-subject components of variability. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for each subject/analyte combination.

resultsWithin-subject coefficients of variation for these analytes ranged from 67.6% to 172.1% for the in-clinic samples and from 111.9% to 201.0% for the at-home samples. The ICC for the various analytes ranged from 41% to 61% for the in-clinic samples. The at-home samples exhibited significantly more variability than did those obtained in the clinic under supervision.

conclusionsThere was marked within-subject variation in the salivary concentrations of these analytes. With increased interest in salivary diagnostics, the within-subject variability, normal range, and threshold levels for abnormal levels of individual salivary analytes need to be determined if these diagnostics tests are to have clinical usefulness.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAlbuminsAnalysis of VarianceBiomarkersCircadian RhythmDinoprostoneFemaleHumansInterferon-alphaInterleukin-1betaInterleukin-6MaleMatrix Metalloproteinase 8Middle AgedReference ValuesAlbuminsBiomarkersDinoprostoneInterferon-alphaInterleukin-1betaInterleukin-6Matrix Metalloproteinase 8Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID19563296
PMCPMC4131719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.