Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19563114›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2009

Isolation of restriction fragments containing origins of replication from complex genomes.

Larry D Mesner, Joyce L Hamlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Larry D MesnerDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Joyce L Hamlin

Funding

REPLICATION OF MAMMALIAN CHROMOSOMESR01GM026108 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI MESNER, LARRY D · 1985 to 2011
$4.9M
Strategies for mapping origins in mammalian genomesR01HG002937 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI HAMLIN, JOYCE L · 2003 to 2009
$2.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002937NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM026108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification and isolation of origins of replication from mammalian genomes has been a demanding task owing to the great complexity of these genomes. However, two methods have been refined in recent years each of which allows significant enrichment of recently activated origins of replication from asynchronous cell cultures. In one of these, nascent strands are melted from the long template DNA, and the small, origin-centered strands are isolated on sucrose gradients. The second method involves the selective entrapment of bubble-containing fragments in gelling agarose and their subsequent recovery and isolation by molecular cloning. Libraries prepared by this method from Chinese hamster and human cells have been shown to be extremely pure, and provide a renewable resource of origins that can be used as probes on microarrays or sequenced by high-throughput techniques to localize them within the genomic source. The bubble-trapping method is described here for asynchronous mammalian cells that grow with reasonable doubling times and from which nuclear matrices can be reliably prepared. The method for nuclear matrix preparation and enrichment of replication intermediates is described in an accompanying chapter entitled, "Purification of Restriction Fragments Containing Replication Intermediates from Mammalian Cells for 2-D Gel Analysis").

Indexed as

AnimalsDNADNA ReplicationDNA Restriction EnzymesGenomicsHumansNucleotide MappingReplication OriginRepliconDNADNA Restriction Enzymes

Identifiers

PMID19563114
PMCPMC2898177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.