Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19562419›Full record

SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2009

Treatment of obesity in primary care practice in the United States: a systematic review.

Adam Gilden Tsai, Thomas A Wadden

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02893163 (CHANGE), which is not on this map. Cited by 108 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
37.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02893163 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

CHANGE (Canadian Health Advanced by Nutrition and Graded Exercise) Cancer Alberta: A Primary Care Program for Cancer Prevention and Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2016 to 2023Enrolled750ConditionsMetabolic Syndrome, Risk FactorsArmsCHANGE Intervention, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 223 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cognitive and behavioural strategies for self-directed weight loss: systematic review of qualitative studies.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. A systematic review of motivational interviewing for weight loss among adults in primary care.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adam Gilden TsaiDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA. adam.tsai@ucdenver.edu
Thomas A Wadden
University of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Improving the Management of Obesity in Primary Care PracticeU01HL087072 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WADDEN, THOMAS A. · 2006 to 2010
$5.4M
CAREER DEVELOPMENT IN WOMEN'S HEALTH RESEARCH AND GENDE*K12HD043459 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FREEMAN, ELLEN W · 2002 to 2006
$2.4M
IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF OBESITY MANAGEMENTK24DK065018 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WADDEN, THOMAS A. · 2003 to 2013
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL087072NHLBI NIH HHS U01-HL087072NICHD NIH HHS 5-K12-HD043459-04NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD043459NIDDK NIH HHS DK065018NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK065018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis review examines the results of randomized controlled trials in which behavioral weight loss interventions, used alone or with pharmacotherapy, were provided in primary care settings. DATA SOURCES: Literature search of MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, and EMBASE (1950-present). Inclusion criteria for studies were: (1) randomized trial, (2) obesity intervention in US adults, and (3) conducted in primary care or explicitly intended to model a primary care setting. REVIEW

methodsBoth authors reviewed each study to extract treatment modality, provider, setting, weight change, and attrition. The CONSORT criteria were used to assess study quality. Due to the small number and heterogeneity of studies, results were summarized but not pooled quantitatively.

resultsTen trials met the inclusion criteria. Studies were classified as: (1) PCP counseling alone, (2) PCP counseling + pharmacotherapy, and (3) "collaborative" obesity care (treatment delivered by a non-physician provider). Weight losses in the active treatment arms of these categories of studies ranged from 0.1 to 2.3 kg, 1.7 to 7.5 kg, and 0.4 to 7.7 kg, respectively. Most studies provided low- or moderate-intensity counseling, as defined by the US Preventive Services Task Force.

conclusionsCurrent evidence does not support the use of low- to moderate-intensity physician counseling for obesity, by itself, to achieve clinically meaningful weight loss. PCP counseling plus pharmacotherapy, or intensive counseling (from a dietitian or nurse) plus meal replacements may help patients achieve this goal. Further research is needed on different models of managing obesity in primary care practice.

Indexed as

Anti-Obesity AgentsHumansObesityPrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesWeight LossAnti-Obesity Agents

Identifiers

PMID19562419
PMCPMC2726879
OpenAlexW2029877192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.