ArticlePediatric surgery international2009
Risk management in pediatric surgery.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical implications of HIV infection.Pediatric surgery international · 2022Review
- Guiding Principles for Surgical Pathways: A Tool for Improving Outcomes and Patient Safety.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- The Burden of Disease and Pathology at a Rapidly Expanding Tertiary Paediatric Surgical Unit in South Africa.World journal of surgery · 2021Article
- Magnetic resonance urography and laparoscopy in paediatric urology: a case series.Pediatric radiology · 2013Article
- Near-miss events are really missed! Reflections on incident reporting in a department of pediatric surgery.Pediatric surgery international · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo present the experience documented over 1 year of analysis and quality control on surgical complications and organizational accidents.
methodsAll children admitted during the study period at our Institution were included in the analysis, which consisted of four phases: (1) definition and standardization of perioperative diagnostic and therapeutic tracks; (2) staff education; (3) documentation and data implementation, and (4) "Morbidity and Mortality" audit.
resultsOver a 1-year study period, 3,116 children were admitted to our Institution: 2,222 out of 3,116 (71.3%) children underwent a surgical procedure. A total number of 184 complications were recorded in 149 patients. One hundred and seventy-one (92.9%) complications occurred following a surgical procedure. Fifty-six out of 149 complicated patients (37.6%) required a re-operation. Thirty-five out of 184 (19%) complications were classified as organizational. Infection represented the most common complication. All cases of anastomotic dehiscence and perforation, bowel obstruction, and stoma malfunction required reintervention. None of the postoperative bleedings required a second surgical procedure.
conclusionAlthough a proper statistical comparison with literature complication rates is not feasible, our experience confirms the importance of quality-control audit in health care systems. Prolonged observation, long-term follow up, and comparison with previous results will represent our future goal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.