ArticleLa Radiologia medica2010
Computation of brain metabolite ratios in single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy: comparison between semiautomatic and automatic software.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Insight into MetabolicFrontiers in neurology · 2017Article
- Reproducibility of brain metabolite concentration measurements in lesion free white matter at 1.5 T.BMC medical imaging · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMetabolite ratios are the measurements most commonly utilised for clinical applications of brain proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) [1]. We evaluated the agreement between the metabolite ratios calculated with semiautomatic and automatic software. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwo single-voxel spectra (3.375 ml) localised in the frontal grey matter (GM) and peritrigonal white matter (WM) were obtained in 20 healthy subjects by using a point-resolved proton spectroscopy sequence (PRESS, TE=144 ms). The spectra were processed using the semiautomatic software J-Magnetic Resonance User Interface (JMRUI) and the automatic software SpectroView. Agreement of the N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA)/creatine (Cr), NAA/choline (Cho) and Cho/Cr ratios calculated with the two methods was assessed by estimating the 95% limits of agreement (LAs) of the differences of the values obtained with the two software packages.
resultsMean values and standard deviations of NAA/Cr, Cho/Cr and NAA/Cho (semiautomatic//automatic software) were 1.99+/-0.53//1.73+/-0.36, 1.13+/-0.40//1.04+/-0.33, 1.85+/-0.62//1.89+/-0.69 for the GM and 2.24+/-0.41//2.37+/-0.27, 0.96+/-0.17//1.13+/-0.15, 2.37+/-0.43//2.11+/-0.23 for the WM. The 95% LAs were wider for GM spectra and ranged between -0.51, 0.17 for Cho/Cr in the WM and -1.54, 1.47 for NAA/Cho in the GM.
conclusionsThe difference between brain metabolite ratios calculated with the two software packages is not negligible and reflects spectral quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19562268What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.