Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19561320›Full record

ArticleBlood2009

Programming tumor-reactive effector memory CD8+ T cells in vitro obviates the requirement for in vivo vaccination.

Christopher A Klebanoff, Zhiya Yu, Leroy N Hwang, Douglas C Palmer, Luca Gattinoni, Nicholas P Restifo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microwave ablation combined with dendritic cells enhances CD8Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Memory CD8Seminars in immunology · 2020
    Review
  4. CD4Cancer science · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dendritic Cells in Irradiated Mice Trigger the Functional Plasticity and Antitumor Activity of Adoptively Transferred Tc17 Cells via IL12 Signaling.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Elimination of progressive mammary cancer by repeated administrations of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Determinants of successful CD8+ T-cell adoptive immunotherapy for large established tumors in mice.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2011
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher A KlebanoffHoward Hughes Medical Institute-National Institutes of Health Research Scholars Program, Bethesda, MD, USA. klebanoc@mail.nih.gov
Zhiya Yu
Leroy N Hwang
Douglas C Palmer
Luca Gattinoni
Nicholas P Restifo
National Cancer Institute · USCenter for Cancer Research · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Building on the success of the adoptive immunotherapy of cancerZIABC010763 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ROSENBERG, STEVEN · 2009 to 2020
$25.0M
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naive and memory CD8(+) T cells can undergo programmed activation and expansion in response to a short T-cell receptor stimulus, but the extent to which in vitro programming can qualitatively substitute for an in vivo antigen stimulation remains unknown. We show that self-/tumor-reactive effector memory CD8(+) T cells (T(EM)) programmed in vitro either with peptide-pulsed antigen-presenting cells or plate-bound anti-CD3/anti-CD28 embark on a highly stereotyped response of in vivo clonal expansion and tumor destruction nearly identical to that of vaccine-stimulated T(EM) cells. This programmed response was associated with an interval of antigen-independent interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) release that facilitated the dynamic expression of the major histocompatibility complex class I restriction element H-2D(b) on responding tumor cells, leading to recognition and subsequent tumor lysis. Delaying cell transfer for more than 24 hours after stimulation or infusion of cells deficient in IFN-gamma entirely abrogated the benefit of the programmed response, whereas transfer of cells unable to respond to IFN-gamma had no detriment to antitumor immunity. These findings extend the phenomenon of a programmable effector response to memory CD8(+) T cells and have major implications for the design of current adoptive-cell transfer trials.

Indexed as

AnimalsCancer VaccinesCD28 AntigensCD3 ComplexCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell SeparationFlow CytometryGenes, MHC Class IInterferon-gammaIn Vitro TechniquesMajor Histocompatibility ComplexMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceMice, TransgenicNeoplasmsPhenotypeCancer VaccinesCD28 AntigensCD3 ComplexInterferon-gamma

Identifiers

PMID19561320
PMCPMC2738567
OpenAlexW1978281993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.