Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19560743›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2009

Novel drug delivery strategies in neuro-oncology.

Dani S Bidros, Michael A Vogelbaum

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Pharmacological Activities of Aminophenoxazinones.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dani S BidrosDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor and NeuroOncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Michael A Vogelbaum

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of malignant gliomas represents one of the most formidable challenges in oncology. Despite treatment with surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, the prognosis remains poor, particularly for glioblastoma, which has a median survival of 12 to 15 months. An important impediment to finding effective treatments for malignant gliomas is the presence of the blood brain barrier, which serves to prevent delivery of potentially active therapeutic compounds. Multiple efforts are focused on developing strategies to effectively deliver active drugs to brain tumor cells. Blood brain barrier disruption and convection-enhanced delivery have emerged as leading investigational delivery techniques for the treatment of malignant brain tumors. Clinical trials using these methods have been completed, with mixed results, and several more are being initiated. In this review, we describe the clinically available methods used to circumvent the blood brain barrier and summarize the results to date of ongoing and completed clinical trials.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBlood-Brain BarrierBrainBrain NeoplasmsCatheterizationDrug Delivery SystemsDrug ImplantsExotoxinsGenetic VectorsGlioblastomaGliomaHumansImmunotoxinsInterleukinsPseudomonas aeruginosa Exotoxin AAntineoplastic AgentsDrug ImplantsExotoxinsImmunotoxinsInterleukinsPseudomonas aeruginosa Exotoxin ATransferrinTransforming Growth Factor alphatransforming growth factor(alpha)-Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin (38)Transforming Growth Factor beta

Identifiers

PMID19560743
PMCPMC5084189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.