Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19560489›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2009

Laser-evoked synaptic transmission in cultured hippocampal neurons expressing channelrhodopsin-2 delivered by adeno-associated virus.

Jennifer Wang, Mazahir T Hasan, H Sebastian Seung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Local production of corticotropin-releasing hormone in prefrontal cortex modulates male-specific novelty exploration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Acat1 knockdown gene therapy decreases amyloid-β in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2013
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Astrocytes display complex and localized calcium responses to single-neuron stimulation in the hippocampus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer WangDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue 46-5065, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. jenwang@mit.edu
Mazahir T Hasan
H Sebastian Seung

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a method for studying synaptic transmission in mass cultures of dissociated hippocampal neurons based on patch clamp recording combined with laser stimulation of neurons expressing channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2). Our goal was to use the high spatial resolution of laser illumination to come as close as possible to the ideal of identifying monosynaptically coupled pairs of neurons, which is conventionally done using microisland rather than mass cultures. Using recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) to deliver the ChR2 gene, we focused on the time period between 14 and 20 days in vitro, during which expression levels are high, and spontaneous bursting activity has not yet started. Stimulation by wide-field illumination is sufficient to make the majority of ChR2-expressing neurons spike. Stimulation with a laser spot at least 10 microm in diameter also produces action potentials, but in a reduced fraction of neurons. We studied synaptic transmission by voltage-clamping a neuron with low expression of ChR2 and scanning a 40 microm laser spot at surrounding locations. Responses were observed to stimulation at a subset of locations in the culture, indicating spatial localization of stimulation. Pharmacological means were used to identify responses that were synaptic. Many responses were of smaller amplitude than those typically found in microisland cultures. We were unable to find an entirely reliable criterion for distinguishing between monosynaptic and polysynaptic responses. However, we propose that postsynaptic currents with small amplitudes, simple shapes, and latencies not much greater than 8 ms are reasonable candidates for monosynaptic interactions.

Indexed as

LasersAction PotentialsAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBacterial ProteinsCells, CulturedDependovirusHippocampusLuminescent ProteinsMicroscopy, ConfocalNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesRatsReaction TimeRhodopsinSynaptic TransmissionBacterial ProteinsLuminescent ProteinsRhodopsinyellow fluorescent protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID19560489
PMCPMC2762116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.