Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19560469›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology2010

Translational lessons from scarless healing of cutaneous wounds and regenerative repair of the myocardium.

Joseph A Palatinus, J Matthew Rhett, Robert G Gourdie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Computational model predicts paracrine and intracellular drivers of fibroblast phenotype after myocardial infarction.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2020
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The pharmacology of regenerative medicine.Pharmacological reviews · 2013
    Review
  9. Model systems for cardiovascular regenerative biology.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2013
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Embryonic wound healing: a primer for engineering novel therapies for tissue repair.Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews · 2012
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Self-organizing tissue-engineered constructs in collagen hydrogels.Microscopy and microanalysis : the official journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Complex temporal regulation of capillary morphogenesis by fibroblasts.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2010
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph A PalatinusDepartment of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Cardiovascular Developmental Biology Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 171 Ashley Avenue, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
J Matthew Rhett
Robert G Gourdie
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

PATTERNING OF GAP JUNCTION COUPLING IN DEVELOPING HEARTR01HL056728 · NHLBI · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI GOURDIE, ROBERT G · 1997 to 2021
$5.6M
FUNCTION OF CX43-INTERACTING PROTEINS IN NEURAL CREST MIGRATIONR01HL082802 · NHLBI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI GOURDIE, ROBERT G · 2006 to 2009
$1.4M
Connexin 43 gap junction dynamics in the diabetic heartF30HL095320 · NHLBI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI PALATINUS, JOSEPH A. · 2009 to 2013
$167k
Restoration of Skin Structure and Function Post-WoundingR41AR053798 · NIAMS · XEQUEL BIO, INC. · PI GOURDIE, ROBERT G · 2006 to 2006
$152k
NHLBI NIH HHS F30 HL095320NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL056728NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL082802NIAMS NIH HHS R41 AR053798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regenerative healing is the process by which injured tissues are restored to their original structure and function. Many species are capable of healing in this manner. However, in mammals the healing response in most tissues is marked by fibroblast proliferation and scar tissue deposition. While scarring contributes to efficient resolution of mammalian wounds and restoration of at least partial structural and functional support, the final result of scar formation can be more deleterious than the initial insult. This is especially true in the heart, which is sensitive to electrical heterogeneities and altered mechanical properties produced by scarring. Several therapeutic modalities promoting regeneration in skin wounds have been developed that modulate various aspects of the healing process. Targets include cytokine stimulation, control of fibroblast activation, modulation of gap junctions, and stem cell differentiation. Here, we review and compare mechanisms of injury, repair, and scarring in the skin and heart and discuss the promise and caveats of future therapies that may translate to improving repair of myocardial tissues.

Indexed as

AnimalsCicatrixHumansModels, BiologicalMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumSkinWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID19560469
PMCPMC2824039
OpenAlexW2018434251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.