Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19559791›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences2009

Selective removal of stratum corneum by microdermabrasion to increase skin permeability.

Harvinder S Gill, Samantha N Andrews, Senthilkumar K Sakthivel, Andrew Fedanov, Ifor R Williams, David A Garber, Frances H Priddy, Seth Yellin, Mark B Feinberg, Silvija I Staprans and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. OxygeneoThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2017
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. DNA vaccination in the skin using microneedles improves protection against influenza.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2012
    Article
  16. Delivery systems for intradermal vaccination.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2012
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Enabling skin vaccination using new delivery technologies.Drug delivery and translational research · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Harvinder S GillWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0100, USA.
Samantha N Andrews
Senthilkumar K Sakthivel
Andrew Fedanov
Ifor R Williams
David A Garber
Frances H Priddy
Seth Yellin
Mark B Feinberg
Silvija I Staprans
Mark R Prausnitz
Emory University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · USThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering · US

Funding

Virology and Molecular Biomarkers CoreP30AI050409 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Carlos del Rio · 2002 to 2026
$74.0M
Self-administered microneedle patches for influenza vaccinesU01AI074579 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI COMPANS, RICHARD W · 2007 to 2011
$7.7M
Microneedle-based immunization against pandemic influenzaR01EB006369 · NIBIB · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PRAUSNITZ, MARK R. · 2007 to 2011
$3.6M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050409NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI074579NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006369NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study sought to determine if microdermabrasion can selectively remove stratum corneum to increase skin permeability. Although, microdermabrasion has been used for cosmetic treatment of skin for decades, no study has assessed the detailed effects of microdermabrasion conditions on the degree of skin tissue removal. Therefore, we histologically characterized the skin of rhesus macaques and human volunteers after microdermabrasion at different conditions. Using mobile tip microdermabrasion, an increase in the number of treatment passes led to greater tissue removal ranging from minimal effects to extensive damage to deeper layers of the skin. Of note, these data showed for the first time that at moderate microdermabrasion conditions selective yet full-thickness removal of stratum corneum could be achieved with little damage to deeper skin tissues. In the stationary mode of microdermabrasion, selective stratum corneum removal was not observed, but micro-blisters could be seen. Similar tissue removal trends were observed in human volunteers. As proof of concept for drug delivery applications, a model fluorescent drug (fluorescein) was delivered through microdermabraded skin and antibodies were generated against vaccinia virus after its topical application in monkeys. In conclusion, microdermabrasion can selectively remove full-thickness stratum corneum with little damage to deeper tissues and thereby increase skin permeability.

Indexed as

PermeabilitySkin AbsorptionAdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsDermabrasionFemaleHumansMacaca mulattaMaleMicroscopy, Electron, Scanning

Identifiers

PMID19559791
PMCPMC2731013
OpenAlexW1969654631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.