Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19559084›Full record

ReviewNeurotoxicology and teratology

Drosophotoxicology: the growing potential for Drosophila in neurotoxicology.

Matthew D Rand

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotoxicology and teratology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Conserved Molecular Responses to Arsenite Exposure inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Integrating network analysis and machine learning to elucidate chemical-induced pancreatic toxicity in zebrafish embryos.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Arsenic toxicity in theFrontiers in toxicology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Future avenues inLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Matthew D RandDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA. mdrand@zoo.uvm.edu

Funding

Mechanisms of methylmercury toxicity in neural developmentR01ES015550 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI RAND, MATTHEW D · 2007 to 2011
$1.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES015550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding neurotoxic mechanisms is a challenge of deciphering which genes and gene products in the developing or mature nervous system are targeted for disruption by chemicals we encounter in our environment. Our understanding of nervous system development and physiology is highly advanced due in large part to studies conducted in simple non-mammalian models. The paucity of toxicological data for the more than 80,000 chemicals in commercial use today, and the approximately 2000 new chemicals introduced each year, makes development of sensitive and rapid assays to screen for neurotoxicity paramount. In this article I advocate the use of Drosophila in the modern regimen of toxicological testing, emphasizing its unique attributes for assaying neurodevelopment and behavior. Features of the Drosophila model are reviewed and a generalized overall scheme for its use in toxicology is presented. Examples of where the fly has proven fruitful in evaluating common toxicants in our environment are also highlighted. Attention is drawn to three areas where development and application of the fly model might benefit toxicology the most: 1) optimizing sensitive endpoints for pathway-specific screening, 2) accommodating high throughput demands for analysis of chemical toxicant libraries, 3) optimizing genetic and molecular protocols for more rapid identification toxicant-by-gene interactions. While there are shortcomings in the Drosophila model, which exclude it from effective toxicological testing in certain arenas, conservation of fundamental cellular and developmental mechanisms between flies and man is extensive enough to warrant a central role for the Drosophila model in toxicological testing of today.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophilaHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysNervous SystemSmall Molecule LibrariesToxicity TestsSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID19559084
PMCPMC2818018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.