ArticleBMC family practice2009
It's all about recognition! Qualitative study of the value of interpersonal continuity in general practice.
Article in BMC family practice, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shared care and gender identity support in Primary Care: The perspectives and experiences of parents/carers of young trans people.Health (London, England : 1997) · 2024Article
- Why does continuity of care with family doctors matter? Review and qualitative synthesis of patient and physician perspectives.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021Review
- Article
- Factors Associated With Patient Satisfaction in Outpatient Department of Suva Sub-divisional Health Center, Fiji, 2018: A Mixed Method Study.Frontiers in public health · 2019Article
- Conveying hope in consultations with patients with life-threatening diseases: the balance between supporting and challenging the patient.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2017Article
- How can the general practitioner support adolescent children of ill or substance-abusing parents? A qualitative study among adolescents.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2016Article
- The patient, the doctor, and the patient's loyalty: a qualitative study in French general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016Article
- Patient perspectives on test result communication in primary care: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015Article
- Patients' assessments of the continuity of primary care in Finland: a 15-year follow-up questionnaire survey.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014Article
- Characteristics of complaints resulting in disciplinary actions against Danish GPs.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2013Article
- Gynecological cancer patients' differentiated use of help from a nurse navigator: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2012Article
- Power and powerlessness: GPs' narratives about lifestyle counselling.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012Article
- Attachment in the doctor-patient relationship in general practice: a qualitative study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContinuity of care has traditionally been regarded as a core quality of general practice, but the long-term doctor-patient relationship has been put under pressure. In many places practices are expanding, with larger teams and more registered patients, thereby threatening the possibility of patients staying with their own general practitioner (GP). GPs often take it for granted that interpersonal continuity is valuable. However, little is known about how patient satisfaction is related to interpersonal continuity. The purpose of this study is to explore the creation of patient satisfaction or dissatisfaction in the interpersonal relation with the GP, and in a comprehensive way to investigate how this is related to continuity of care.
methodsQualitative study based on 22 interviews with patients from two practices in Denmark. A total of 12 patients saw a regular doctor and 10 saw an unfamiliar doctor. The patients were selected after an observed consultation and sampled purposefully according to reason for encounter, age and sex. Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was used to study how patients perceive meeting either a regular or an unfamiliar GP. The analysis explored the patients' perception of their interpersonal relationship with their GP, and interpreted the accounts by using social psychological theories.
resultsA long-term continuous relationship with the GP could be satisfactory, but it could also be the reverse. The same pattern was shown in case of an unfamiliar GP. Therefore, patient satisfaction and interpersonal continuity were not causally related. On the contrary, there was a general pattern of how the satisfactory and trustful doctor-patient relationship from the patients' point of view could be created, maintained or destroyed. A pattern where the process of recognition, by respecting and remembering, on the one hand created and maintained satisfaction while humiliation on the other hand destroyed satisfaction in the relationship.
conclusionIt was not valuable to have a continuous relationship unless the GP recognized the patient. The social psychological concept of recognition had two different meanings and the GP had to do both, respect and remember the patient, in order to create and sustain the trustful relationship. The added value of interpersonal continuity had to be combined with recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.