Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19558654›Full record

Trial reportMalaria journal2009

Efficacy of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine with or without artesunate for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in southern Mozambique: a randomized controlled trial.

Elizabeth N Allen, Francesca Little, Tunisio Camba, Yasmin Cassam, Jaishree Raman, Andrew Boulle, Karen I Barnes

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Malaria journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00203736 nacompletednot on this map

Open Label Drug Study (With Single and Parallel Group Components) to Evaluate Combination Antimalarial Therapy for Efficacy, Gametocyte Carriage and Molecular Markers Associated With SP Resistance in Uncomplicated Plasmodium Falciparum Infections

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Cape TownRan2003 to 2003Enrolled240ConditionsMalariaArmsSulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, Artesunate plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine
NCT00203814 nacompletednot on this map

Open-Label, Randomised, Parallel Group in Vivo Drug Study to Evaluate Combination Anti-Malarial Therapy (CAT), Artesunate and Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine Versus Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine Alone, in Terms of Therapeutic Efficacy, Prevalence of Gametocyte Carriage and Prevalence of Molecular Markers Associated With SP Resistance In Uncomplicated Plasmodium Falciparum Infections.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Cape TownRan2004 to 2005Enrolled280ConditionsMalariaArmsSulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, Artesunate plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Mapping Antimalarial Drug Resistance in Mozambique: A Systematic Review ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elizabeth N AllenDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa. elizabeth.allen@uct.ac.za
Francesca Little
Tunisio Camba
Yasmin Cassam
Jaishree Raman
Andrew Boulle
Karen I Barnes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn artemisinin-based combination therapy, artesunate (AS) plus sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), was compared to SP monotherapy to provide evidence of further treatment options in southern Mozambique.

methodsBetween 2003 and 2005, 411 patients over one year and 10 kg with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria were randomly allocated SP (25/1.25 mg per kg day 0) or AS/SP (as above plus 4 mg/kg artesunate days 0, 1 and 2). Allocation was concealed, but treatment was open-label except to microscopists. The primary objective was the relative risk of treatment failure, which was assessed using World Health Organization response definitions modified to a 42-day follow-up.

resultsOf the 411 subjects enrolled, 359 (87.3%) completed the follow up period (SP n = 175, AS/SP n = 184). A survival analysis including 408 subjects showed that the polymerase chain reaction-adjusted cure rates were 90.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 84.9%-93.9%) and 98.0% (95% CI 94.8%-99.3%) for SP and AS/SP respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that treatment with AS/SP decreased the relative hazard of treatment failure by 80% compared to SP (hazard ratio [HR] 0.2; 95% CI 0.1-0.6) and age over seven years decreased the relative hazard of failure by 70% (HR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1-0.9), when compared to younger age. However, having a quintuple dhfr/dhps mutation increased the relative hazard of failure compared to fewer mutations (HR 3.2; 95% CI 1.3-7.5) and baseline axillary temperature increased the relative hazard of failure by 50% for each degree C increase (HR 1.5; 95% CI 1.1-2.2).

conclusionWhile both treatments were efficacious, AS plus SP significantly decreased the relative hazard of treatment failure compared to SP monotherapy Artesunate plus sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine, but not sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine monotherapy, met the current WHO criteria of >95% efficacy for policy implementation.

trial registrationNCT00203736 and NCT00203814.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsArtemisininsArtesunateDrug CombinationsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMalaria, FalciparumMaleMozambiquePlasmodium falciparumPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, GeneticProportional Hazards ModelsAntimalarialsArtemisininsArtesunateDrug Combinationsfanasil, pyrimethamine drug combinationPyrimethamineSulfadoxine

Identifiers

PMID19558654
PMCPMC2709115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.