Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19557438›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics2009

Redefined genomic architecture in 15q24 directed by patient deletion/duplication breakpoint mapping.

Ayman W El-Hattab, Teresa A Smolarek, Martha E Walker, Elizabeth K Schorry, LaDonna L Immken, Gayle Patel, Mary-Alice Abbott, Brendan C Lanpher, Zhishuo Ou, Sung-Hae L Kang and 5 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Structural polymorphism and diversity of human segmental duplications.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genomic Disorders and Neurocognitive Impairment in Pediatric CKD.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2017
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Maturation of cortical circuits requires Semaphorin 7A.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The genetics of microdeletion and microduplication syndromes: an update.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ayman W El-HattabDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Rm R809, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Teresa A Smolarek
Martha E Walker
Elizabeth K Schorry
LaDonna L Immken
Gayle Patel
Mary-Alice Abbott
Brendan C Lanpher
Zhishuo Ou
Sung-Hae L Kang
Ankita Patel
Fernando Scaglia
James R Lupski
Sau Wai Cheung
Pawel Stankiewicz

Funding

MEDICAL GENETICS RESEARCH FELLOWSHIP PROGRAMT32GM007526 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Brendan Lee · 1985 to 2026
$11.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report four new patients with a submicroscopic deletion in 15q24 manifesting developmental delay, short stature, hypotonia, digital abnormalities, joint laxity, genital abnormalities, and characteristic facial features. These clinical features are shared with six recently reported patients with a 15q24 microdeletion, supporting the notion that this is a recognizable syndrome. We describe a case of an ~2.6 Mb microduplication involving a portion of the minimal deletion critical region in a 15-year-old male with short stature, mild mental retardation, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Asperger syndrome, decreased joint mobility, digital abnormalities, and characteristic facial features. Some of these features are shared with a recently reported case with a 15q24 microduplication involving the minimal deletion critical region. We also report two siblings and their mother with duplication adjacent and distal to this region exhibiting mild developmental delay, hypotonia, tapering fingers, characteristic facial features, and prominent ears. The deletion and duplication breakpoints were mapped by array comparative genomic hybridization and the genomic structure in 15q24 was analyzed further. Surprisingly, in addition to the previously recognized three low-copy repeat clusters (BP1, BP2, and BP3), we identified two other paralogous low-copy repeat clusters that likely mediated the formation of alternative sized 15q24 genomic rearrangements via non-allelic homologous recombination.

Indexed as

Chromosome BreakageChromosome DeletionChromosome MappingGene DuplicationAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolChromosomes, Human, Pair 15Comparative Genomic HybridizationFemaleGene DosageHumansInfantIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMalePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID19557438
PMCPMC3669685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.