Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19557384›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2009

IRS1 G972R polymorphism and type 2 diabetes: a paradigm for the difficult ascertainment of the contribution to disease susceptibility of 'low-frequency-low-risk' variants.

E Morini, S Prudente, E Succurro, M Chandalia, Y-Y Zhang, S Mammarella, F Pellegrini, C Powers, V Proto, B Dallapiccola and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. IRS1 gene variants, dysglycaemic metabolic changes and type-2 diabetes risk.Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD · 2012
    Article
  13. Genetic prediction of common diseases. Still no help for the clinical diabetologist!Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD · 2012
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

E MoriniIRCCS, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza-Mendel Institute, Viale Regina Margherita 261, Postal Code 00198, Rome, Italy.
S Prudente
E Succurro
M Chandalia
Y-Y Zhang
S Mammarella
F Pellegrini
C Powers
V Proto
B Dallapiccola
A Cama
G Sesti
N Abate
A Doria
V Trischitta

Funding

SPECIAL ASSAY COREP30DK036836 · NIDDK · JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER · PI JEAN E. SCHAFFER · 1986 to 2026
$50.5M
Variability in Adipokine Genes and AtherosclerosisR01HL073168 · NHLBI · JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER · PI DORIA, ALESSANDRO · 2003 to 2012
$5.8M
Search for new MODY genes and molecular studies of their function in beta cellsR01DK055523 · NIDDK · JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER · PI DORIA, ALESSANDRO, KULKARNI, ROHIT N. · 1998 to 2014
$4.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL073168NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL073168NIDDK NIH HHS DK036836NIDDK NIH HHS DK055523NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK036836NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK055523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisThe aim of the study was to determine the association between IRS1 G972R polymorphism and type 2 diabetes; published data concerning this association have been conflicting. To obtain further insight into this topic, we performed a meta-analysis of all available case-control studies.

methodsWe performed a meta-analysis of 32 studies (12,076 cases and 11,285 controls).

resultsThe relatively infrequent R972 variant was not significantly associated with type 2 diabetes (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.96-1.23, p = 0.184 under a dominant model). Some evidence of heterogeneity was observed across studies (p = 0.1). In the 14 studies (9,713 individuals) in which the mean age at type 2 diabetes diagnosis was available, this variable explained 52% of the heterogeneity (p = 0.03). When these studies were subdivided into tertiles of mean age at diagnosis, the OR for diabetes was 1.48 (95% CI 1.17-1.87), 1.22 (95% CI 0.97-1.53) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.68-1.13) in the youngest, intermediate and oldest tertile, respectively (p = 0.0022 for trend of ORs). CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationOur findings illustrate the difficulties of ascertaining the contribution of 'low-frequency-low-risk' variants to type 2 diabetes susceptibility. In the specific context of the R972 variant, approximately 200,000 study individuals would be needed to have 80% power to identify a 9% increase in diabetes risk at a genome-wide significance level. Under these circumstances, a strategy aimed at improving outcome definition and decreasing its heterogeneity may critically enhance our ability to detect genetic effects, thereby decreasing the required sample size. Our data suggest that focusing on early-onset diabetes, which is characterised by a stronger genetic background, may be part of such a strategy.

Indexed as

Gene FrequencyGenetic Predisposition to DiseasePolymorphism, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAge of OnsetAmino Acid SubstitutionCase-Control StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DNAGenetic VariationHumansInsulin Receptor Substrate ProteinsMeta-Analysis as TopicOdds RatioReference ValuesSample SizeDNAInsulin Receptor Substrate ProteinsIRS1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID19557384
PMCPMC2782547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.