Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19557207›Full record

Trial reportCanadian respiratory journal

Montelukast as an alternative to low-dose inhaled corticosteroids in the management of mild asthma (the SIMPLE trial): an open-label effectiveness trial.

R Andrew McIvor, Alan Kaplan, Caroline Koch, John S Sampalis

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Canadian respiratory journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Risk factors for montelukast treatment failure in step-down therapy for controlled asthma.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2011
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Montelukast in asthma: a review of its efficacy and place in therapy.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2011
    Article
  8. Asthma management made too SIMPLE.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2010
    Article
  9. Asthma management in the real world: The perils of simplicity.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2010
    Article
  10. Real-life asthma care in Canada.Canadian respiratory journal
    Review
  11. The SIMPLE trial.Canadian respiratory journal
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R Andrew McIvorFirestone Institute of Respiratory Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. amcivor@stjosham.on.ca
Alan Kaplan
Caroline Koch
John S Sampalis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of montelukast as monotherapy for patients with mild asthma who remain uncontrolled or unsatisfied while on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) monotherapy.

designA multicentre, open-label study. Patients (six years of age or older) had ICS therapy discontinued and were treated with orally administered montelukast once daily for six weeks.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome measure was the rate at which asthma symptom control was achieved or maintained after six weeks of treatment. The secondary outcome measures were to compare compliance and physician satisfaction, and to further assess the safety and tolerability of montelukast.

resultsOf the 534 patients enrolled, 481 (90.1%) completed the study. Mean (+/- SD) age was 27.8+/-19.0 years. The number of patients with uncontrolled symptoms decreased from 455 (85.2%) at baseline to 143 (26.8%) at week 6 (P<0.001), and mean Asthma Control Questionnaire score decreased from 1.4+/-0.8 to 0.6+/-0.6 (P<0.001), representing a clinically significant improvement. Of the 79 patients with controlled asthma symptoms at baseline, 73.4% maintained asthma control at week 6. Compliance to asthma therapy increased from 41% at baseline for ICS to 88% at week 6 for montelukast (P<0.001). Physician satisfaction with treatment increased from 43% to 85% (P<0.001) and patient satisfaction increased from 45% at baseline to 94% at week 6. No serious adverse events were reported over the course of the study.

conclusionMontelukast is an effective and well-tolerated alternative to ICS treatment in patients with mild asthma who are uncontrolled or unsatisfied with low-dose ICS therapy.

Indexed as

AcetatesAdministration, InhalationAdolescentAdultAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaChildCyclopropanesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlucocorticoidsHumansMalePatient ComplianceAcetatesAnti-Asthmatic AgentsCyclopropanesGlucocorticoidsmontelukastQuinolinesSulfides

Identifiers

PMID19557207
PMCPMC3486709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.