Optimizing protein intake in preterm infants.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

1. Protein supplementation of human milk for promoting growth in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
   Pooled it
2. Protein supplementation of human milk for promoting growth in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
   Pooled it
3. Preterm Nutrition and Clinical Outcomes.Global pediatric health · 2020
   Article
4. Fortification of Human Milk for Preterm Infants: Update and Recommendations of the European Milk Bank Association (EMBA) Working Group on Human Milk Fortification.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Preterm infants fed fortified human milk receive less protein than they need.2009

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as