Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19555070›Full record

ArticleAccounts of chemical research2009

Soluble polymer carriers for the treatment of cancer: the importance of molecular architecture.

Megan E Fox, Francis C Szoka, Jean M J Fréchet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
168citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
28.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

168 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 737 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly of Nonlinear Polymers.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Megan E FoxCollege of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1460, USA.
Francis C Szoka
Jean M J Fréchet
University of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Biocompatible Dendritic Polymers : In Vivo ApplicationsR01EB002047 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SZOKA, FRANCIS C. · 2003 to 2009
$3.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemotherapy can destroy tumors and arrest cancer progress. Unfortunately, severe side effects (treatment is usually a series of injections of highly toxic drugs) often restrict the frequency and size of dosages, much to the detriment of tumor inhibition. Most chemotherapeutic drugs have pharmacokinetic profiles with tremendous potential for improvement. Water-soluble polymers offer the potential to increase drug circulation time, improve drug solubility, prolong drug residence time in a tumor, and reduce toxicity. Cytotoxic drugs that are covalently attached to water-soluble polymers via reversible linkages more effectively target tumor tissue than the drugs alone. Macromolecules passively target solid tumor tissue through a combination of reduced renal clearance and exploitation of the enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) effect, which prevails for fast-growing tumors. Effective drug delivery involves a balance between (i) elimination of the polymeric drug conjugate from the bloodstream by the kidneys, liver, and other organs and (ii) movement of the drug out of the blood vasculature and into the tumor (that is, extravasation). Polymers are eliminated in the kidney by filtration through pores with a size comparable to the hydrodynamic diameter of the polymer; in contrast, the openings in the blood vessel structures that traverse tumors are an order of magnitude greater than the diameter of the polymer. Thus, features that may broadly be grouped as the "molecular architecture" of the polymer, such as its hydrodynamic volume (or molecular weight), molecular conformation, chain flexibility, branching, and location of the attached drug, can greatly impact elimination of the polymer from the body through the kidney but have a much smaller effect on the extravasation of the polymer into the tumor. Molecular architecture can in theory be adjusted to assert essentially independent control over elimination and extravasation. Understanding how molecular architecture affects passage of a polymer through a pore is therefore essential for designing polymer drug carriers that are effective in passively delivering a drug payload while conforming to the requirement that the polymers must eventually be eliminated from the body. In this Account, we discuss examples from in vivo studies that demonstrate how polymer architectural features impact the renal filtration of a polymer as well as tumor penetration and tumor accumulation. In brief, features that inhibit passage of a polymer through a pore, such as higher molecular weight, decreased flexibility, and an increased number of polymer chain ends, help prevent elimination of the polymer by the kidneys and can improve blood circulation times and tumor accumulation, thus improving therapeutic effectiveness.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug CarriersMolecular ConformationNeoplasmsPolymersSolubilityAntineoplastic AgentsDrug CarriersPolymers

Identifiers

PMID19555070
PMCPMC2759385
OpenAlexW1978654303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.