Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19553345›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2009

Regulatory element identification in subsets of transcripts: comparison and integration of current computational methods.

Danhua Fan, Peter B Bitterman, Ola Larsson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Anota2seq Analysis for Transcriptome-Wide Studies of mRNA Translation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Toward a genome-wide landscape of translational control.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Identification of differential translation in genome wide studies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Danhua FanDepartment of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Peter B Bitterman
Ola Larsson
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Molecular Targets for Drug Discovery in IPFR01HL073719 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI BITTERMAN, PETER B · 2003 to 2006
$3.0M
Antifibrotic Drug Discovery in Acute Lung InjuryR01HL076779 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI BITTERMAN, PETER B · 2004 to 2007
$1.8M
Translational Control in IPFR01HL089249 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BITTERMAN, PETER B · 2008 to 2011
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL073719NHLBI NIH HHS HL076779NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL073719NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL076779NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulatory elements in mRNA play an often pivotal role in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. However, a systematic approach to efficiently identify putative regulatory elements from sets of post-transcriptionally coregulated genes is lacking, hampering studies of coregulation mechanisms. Although there are several analytical methods that can be used to detect conserved mRNA regulatory elements in a set of transcripts, there has been no systematic study of how well any of these methods perform individually or as a group. We therefore compared how well three algorithms, each based on a different principle (enumeration, optimization, or structure/sequence profiles), can identify elements in unaligned untranslated sequence regions. Two algorithms were originally designed to detect transcription factor binding sites, Weeder and BioProspector; and one was designed to detect RNA elements conserved in structure, RNAProfile. Three types of elements were examined: (1) elements conserved in both primary sequence and secondary structure; (2) elements conserved only in primary sequence; and (3) microRNA targets. Our results indicate that all methods can uniquely identify certain known RNA elements, and therefore, integrating the output from all algorithms leads to the most complete identification of elements. We therefore developed an approach to integrate results and guide selection of candidate elements from several algorithms presented as a web service (https://dbw.msi.umn.edu:8443/recit). These findings together with the approach for integration can be used to identify candidate elements from genome-wide post-transcriptional profiling data sets.

Indexed as

Regulatory Elements, TranscriptionalAlgorithmsBinding SitesComputational BiologyConserved SequenceInternetMicroRNAsRibosomesRNA, MessengerRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalRNA, UntranslatedTranscription FactorsMicroRNAsRNA, MessengerRNA, UntranslatedTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID19553345
PMCPMC2714745
OpenAlexW2150660819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.