Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19553334›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2009

Differential rates of protein folding and cellular trafficking for the Hendra virus F and G proteins: implications for F-G complex formation.

Shannon D Whitman, Everett Clinton Smith, Rebecca Ellis Dutch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nano-based approach to combat emerging viral (NIPAH virus) infection.Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Paramyxovirus entry.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2013
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shannon D WhitmanDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Biomedical Biological Sciences Research Building, 741 South Limestone, Lexington, KY 40536-0509, USA.
Everett Clinton Smith
Rebecca Ellis Dutch

Funding

SV5 and Hendra virus F protein promoted membrane fusionR01AI051517 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI DUTCH, REBECCA E. · 2002 to 2019
$4.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI051517PHS HHS A151517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hendra virus F protein-promoted membrane fusion requires the presence of the viral attachment protein, G. However, events leading to the association of these glycoproteins remain unclear. Results presented here demonstrate that Hendra virus G undergoes slower secretory pathway trafficking than is observed for Hendra virus F. This slowed trafficking is not dependent on the G protein cytoplasmic tail, the presence of the G receptor ephrin B2, or interaction with other viral proteins. Instead, Hendra virus G was found to undergo intrinsically slow oligomerization within the endoplasmic reticulum. These results suggest that the critical F-G interactions occur only after the initial steps of synthesis and cellular transport.

Indexed as

Protein MultimerizationAnimalsChlorocebus aethiopsEndoplasmic ReticulumHendra VirusProtein FoldingProtein TransportVero CellsViral Envelope ProteinsViral Fusion Proteinsattachment protein GViral Envelope ProteinsViral Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19553334
PMCPMC2738157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.