Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19552604›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2009

Micro- and nanoscale control of the cardiac stem cell niche for tissue fabrication.

Bari Murtuza, Jason W Nichol, Ali Khademhosseini

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Gelatin Methacryloyl-Riboflavin (GelMA-RF) Hydrogels for Bone Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Microfabricated biomaterials for engineering 3D tissues.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2012
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bari Murtuza1 Circulation Sciences and Cardiac Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College , London, United Kingdom .
Jason W Nichol
Ali Khademhosseini
Harvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Microfabricated Vascularized 3D Tissue Engineered ConstructsR01HL092836 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KHADEMHOSSEINI, ALI · 2008 to 2012
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL092836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in stem cell (SC) biology have greatly enhanced our understanding of SC self-renewal and differentiation. Both embryonic and adult SCs can be differentiated into a great variety of tissue cell types, including cardiac myocytes. In vivo studies and clinical trials, however, have demonstrated major limitations in reconstituting the myocardium in failing hearts. These limitations include precise control of SC proliferation, survival and phenotype both prior and subsequent to transplantation and avoidance of serious adverse effects such as tumorigenesis and arrhythmias. Micro- and nanoscale techniques to recreate SC niches, the natural environment for the maintenance and regulation of SCs, have enabled the elucidation of novel SC behaviors and offer great promise in the fabrication of cardiac tissue constructs. The ability to precisely manipulate the interface between biopolymeric scaffolds and SCs at in vivo scale resolutions is unique to micro- and nanoscale approaches and may help overcome limitations of conventional biological scaffolds and methods for cell delivery. We now know that micro- and nanoscale manipulation of scaffold composition, mechanical properties, and three-dimensional architecture have profound influences on SC fate and will likely prove important in developing the next generation of "transplantable SC niches" for regeneration of heart and other tissues. In this review, we examine two key aspects of micro- and nanofabricated SC-based cardiac tissue constructs: the role of scaffold composition and the role of scaffold architecture and detail how recent work in these areas brings us closer to clinical solutions for cardiovascular regeneration.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMechanical PhenomenaMyocardiumNanotechnologyStem Cell NicheTissue EngineeringTissue Scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID19552604
PMCPMC3121785
OpenAlexW2366513450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.