Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19551856›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2009

Active MMP-2 effectively identifies the presence of colorectal cancer.

Mary Jo Murnane, Jinguo Cai, Sania Shuja, David McAneny, Veronica Klepeis, John B Willett

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. TFEB Promotes Prostate Cancer ProgressionFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Anticancer activity ofOncology letters · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mary Jo MurnaneDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA. mmurnane@bu.edu
Jinguo Cai
Sania Shuja
David McAneny
Veronica Klepeis
John B Willett
Boston University · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

MMP-2 and MMP-9: Colorectal Cancer DiagnosisR21CA100837 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI MURNANE, MARY J · 2004 to 2005
$291k
CATHEPSIN B/MMP 9 PROFILES--PREDICTING COLORECTAL CANCERR21CA081515 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI MURNANE, MARY J · 2000 to 2001
$245k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA081515NCI NIH HHS R21 CA100837NCI NIH HHS R21 CA81515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fully active MMP-2 is expressed at such low levels in human tissues that studies often fail to confirm its value as a cancer marker despite strong associations with malignancy. Our study utilized careful extraction, accurate activity measurements, standardization to purified controls and a new statistical metric to determine whether active MMP-2 is an effective indicator of colorectal cancer compared to pro-MMP-2 or pro-MMP-9. MMP-2 and MMP-9 activities were analyzed in matched normal and cancer samples from 269 patients by gelatin zymography, computer-assisted image analysis, serial dilutions of strong samples and standardization to controls. An index of effect size was designed for comparative evaluation of active MMP-2, pro-MMP-2 and pro-MMP-9 activities. For each gelatinase, mean activity and protein levels/mg soluble protein in normal mucosa and colorectal cancer were calculated for the first time with respect to commercial standards. Active MMP-2 activity, detected in 99% of colorectal cancers, was higher in 95% of cancers (on average 10-fold) than in normal mucosa. Levels of pro-MMP-2 and pro-MMP-9, but not active MMP-9, activities were also significantly higher in cancers versus normal. However, active MMP-2 activity provided the most effective test for the presence of cancer (p<0.0.0001) with an effect size statistically significantly larger than for either pro-MMP-2 or pro-MMP-9. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrated that a cut-off for active MMP-2 of >44 SDU activity/mg soluble protein (>180 pg/mg), which is three times mean normal levels, would permit detection of colorectal cancer with an estimated sensitivity of 84% and estimated specificity of 93%.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsEnzyme PrecursorsFemaleGelatinasesHumansImmunoblottingMaleMatrix Metalloproteinase 2Matrix Metalloproteinase 9Middle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorEnzyme PrecursorsGelatinasesMatrix Metalloproteinase 2Matrix Metalloproteinase 9progelatinasepro-matrix metalloproteinase 9

Identifiers

PMID19551856
PMCPMC2775048
OpenAlexW2067342354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.