ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2009
Diet and glycosylated haemoglobin in the 1946 British birth cohort.
Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sodium status is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.European journal of nutrition · 2021Pooled it
- Association between Habitual Dietary Iron Intake and Glucose Metabolism in Individuals after Acute Pancreatitis.Nutrients · 2020Article
- Association of diet and lifestyle with glycated haemoglobin in type 1 diabetes participants in the EURODIAB prospective complications study.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2016Article
- Persistent organic pollutants and biomarkers of diabetes risk in a cohort of Great Lakes sport caught fish consumers.Environmental research · 2015Article
- A meat, processed meat, and French fries dietary pattern is associated with high allostatic load in Puerto Rican older adults.Journal of the American Dietetic Association · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesRaised glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) concentration is a recognized risk factor for diabetes, the incidence of which is rising worldwide. The intake of certain foods has been related to HbA(1c) concentration. The aim of this study was to investigate whether nutrient intake, sourced by these foods, was predictive of raised glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) concentration in a British cohort. SUBJECTS: The subjects were 495 men and 570 women who were members of the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development, 1946 birth cohort.Diet was assessed from 5-day records in 1982, 1989 and 1999. HbA(1c) was measured in blood samples collected in 1999. Individuals in whom concentration of HbA(1c) was > or =6.3% were identified as being 'at risk' and their nutrient intake was compared with those whose concentration of HbA(1c) was within the normal range (< or =6.2%).
resultsLower intakes of protein, carbohydrate, non-starch polysaccharide, iron, folate, vitamin B(12) and a higher percentage energy from fat in 1989 were significantly predictive of high HbA(1c) status in 1999. In 1999, there were no nutrient intakes that were predictive of HbA(1c) status. Global tests of whether the intakes of energy, carbohydrate, sodium, iron, riboflavin and vitamin B(12) at all three time points were related to HbA(1c) status in 1999, were significant.
conclusionAn increased intake of energy, carbohydrate, sodium, iron, riboflavin and vitamin B(12) over 10 years was predictive of raised HbA(1c) status. Increased energy intake may have resulted in increase in body weight, which is a risk factor for diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.