Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19550426›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2009

Wildlife cancer: a conservation perspective.

Denise McAloose, Alisa L Newton

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 195 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Wildlife Diseases: Pathology and Diagnostic Investigation.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Approaches and methods to study wildlife cancer.The Journal of animal ecology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Ancient Diseases in Vertebrates: Tumours through the Ages.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Ectopic Pregnancy and T-Cell Lymphoma in a Eurasian Red Squirrel (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  15. Tumor and Tumor-like Lesions in Red Foxes (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  16. Case report: Renal adenoma in a captive ocelot (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A rare case of giant panda cancer: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2022
    Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Denise McAloosePathology and Disease Investigation, Global Health Program, Wildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, New York, New York 10460, USA. dmcaloose@wcs.org
Alisa L Newton
Wildlife Conservation Society · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Until recently, cancer in wildlife was not considered to be a conservation concern. However, with the identification of Tasmanian devil facial tumour disease, sea turtle fibropapillomatosis and sea lion genital carcinoma, it has become apparent that neoplasia can be highly prevalent and have considerable effects on some species. It is also clear that anthropogenic activities contribute to the development of neoplasia in wildlife species, such as beluga whales and bottom-dwelling fish, making them sensitive sentinels of disturbed environments.

Indexed as

Animals, WildAnimalsEnvironmental PollutionNeoplasmsPrevalenceSea LionsTumor Virus InfectionsTurtlesWhales

Identifiers

PMID19550426
PMCPMC7096862
OpenAlexW2085217863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.