Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19550419›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2009

A population-based cohort study on sun habits and endometrial cancer.

E Epstein, P G Lindqvist, B Geppert, H Olsson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01019785 (Vitamin D During In Vitro Fertilisation), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01019785 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Vitamin D During In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) - A Prospective Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska University HospitalRan2009Enrolled1,000ConditionsPregnancy ComplicationArmsErgocalciferol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Vitamin D and VDR in Gynecological Cancers-A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E EpsteinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University Hospital, 221 85 Lund, Sweden. elisabeth.epstein@med.lu.se
P G Lindqvist
B Geppert
H Olsson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo large cohort study has examined the risk of endometrial cancer in relation to sun exposure.

methodsA population-based cohort study of 29,508 women who answered a questionnaire in 1990-92, of whom 24,098 responded to a follow-up enquiry in 2000-02. They were followed for an average of 15.5 years.

resultsAmong the 17,822 postmenopausal women included, 166 cases of endometrial cancer were diagnosed. We used a multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusting for age and other selected demographic variables to determine the risk of endometrial cancer. Women using sun beds >3 times per year reduced their hazard risk (HR) by 40% (0.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-0.9) or by 50% when adjusting for body mass index or physical activity (HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.9), and those women who were sunbathing during summer reduced their risk by 20% (HR 0.8 95% CI 0.5-1.5) compared with women who did not expose themselves to the sun or to artificial sun (i.e., sun beds).

conclusionExposure to artificial sun by the use of sun beds >3 times per year was associated with a 40% reduction in the risk of endometrial cancer, probably by improving the vitamin D levels during winter.

Indexed as

SunlightAdultCohort StudiesEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisRisk FactorsVitamin DVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID19550419
PMCPMC2720243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.