Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19549995›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2009

Variation in antibiotic prescribing and its impact on recovery in patients with acute cough in primary care: prospective study in 13 countries.

C C Butler, K Hood, T Verheij, P Little, H Melbye, J Nuttall, M J Kelly, S Mölstad, M Godycki-Cwirko, J Almirall and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00353951 (Genomics to Combat Resistance Against Antibiotics in Community-Acquired LRTI in Europe), which is not on this map. Cited by 165 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
165citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00353951 completednot on this map

Genomics to Combat Resistance Against Antibiotics in Community-Acquired LRTI in Europe: GRACE. Workpackage 8. An Observational Study of Cough / Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) in Primary Care

TypeobservationalSponsorCardiff UniversityRan2006 to 2007Enrolled3,402ConditionsCough, Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI), Chest Infection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

165 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Assessing the potential of upper respiratory tract point-of-care testing: a systematic review of the prognostic significance of upper respiratory tract microbes.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Point-of-care urine culture for managing urinary tract infection in primary care: a randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

C C ButlerDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4XN, Wales. ButlerCC@cardiff.ac.uk
K Hood
T Verheij
P Little
H Melbye
J Nuttall
M J Kelly
S Mölstad
M Godycki-Cwirko
J Almirall
A Torres
D Gillespie
U Rautakorpi
S Coenen
H Goossens

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe variation in antibiotic prescribing for acute cough in contrasting European settings and the impact on recovery.

designCross sectional observational study with clinicians from 14 primary care research networks in 13 European countries who recorded symptoms on presentation and management. Patients followed up for 28 days with patient diaries.

settingPrimary care.

participantsAdults with a new or worsening cough or clinical presentation suggestive of lower respiratory tract infection.

main outcome measuresPrescribing of antibiotics by clinicians and total symptom severity scores over time.

results3402 patients were recruited (clinicians completed a case report form for 99% (3368) of participants and 80% (2714) returned a symptom diary). Mean symptom severity scores at presentation ranged from 19 (scale range 0 to 100) in networks based in Spain and Italy to 38 in the network based in Sweden. Antibiotic prescribing by networks ranged from 20% to nearly 90% (53% overall), with wide variation in classes of antibiotics prescribed. Amoxicillin was overall the most common antibiotic prescribed, but this ranged from 3% of antibiotics prescribed in the Norwegian network to 83% in the English network. While fluoroquinolones were not prescribed at all in three networks, they were prescribed for 18% in the Milan network. After adjustment for clinical presentation and demographics, considerable differences remained in antibiotic prescribing, ranging from Norway (odds ratio 0.18, 95% confidence interval 0.11 to 0.30) to Slovakia (11.2, 6.20 to 20.27) compared with the overall mean (proportion prescribed: 0.53). The rate of recovery was similar for patients who were and were not prescribed antibiotics (coefficient -0.01, P<0.01) once clinical presentation was taken into account.

conclusionsVariation in clinical presentation does not explain the considerable variation in antibiotic prescribing for acute cough in Europe. Variation in antibiotic prescribing is not associated with clinically important differences in recovery.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT00353951.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCoughCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID19549995
PMCPMC3272656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.